2016 MOCK DRAFT

Overseasfan

New member
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
1,167
Reaction score
0
Location
The Netherlands
I think Rob Rang's scenario is a lot more likely than Dane Brugler's. If Taylor Decker is available at #26 he'd be a prime candidate to be picked by us and since he's generally projected around the 15-25 range it wouldn't be THAT impossible he lasts untill #26. Picking Jack Conklin would be a headscratcher though. I don't think he fits us at all and we wouldn't pick him if Spriggs, Nkemdiche and Rankins were all still on the board.
 

McGruff

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
5,260
Reaction score
0
Location
Elma, WA
Overseasfan":2reytf60 said:
I think Rob Rang's scenario is a lot more likely than Dane Brugler's. If Taylor Decker is available at #26 he'd be a prime candidate to be picked by us and since he's generally projected around the 15-25 range it wouldn't be THAT impossible he lasts untill #26. Picking Jack Conklin would be a headscratcher though. I don't think he fits us at all and we wouldn't pick him if Spriggs, Nkemdiche and Rankins were all still on the board.
Yeah, Decekr would be a no brainer for me, and I can't imagine Conklin is even on the board. But I didn't think Britt was much of a Seahawk propect either, so who knows.

I do wonder how they would rate Decker compared to Spriggs. Decker his far more polished in his overall game, but Spriggs has that high upside athletic ability.
 

Overseasfan

New member
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
1,167
Reaction score
0
Location
The Netherlands
McGruff":2gxvzzcv said:
Overseasfan":2gxvzzcv said:
I think Rob Rang's scenario is a lot more likely than Dane Brugler's. If Taylor Decker is available at #26 he'd be a prime candidate to be picked by us and since he's generally projected around the 15-25 range it wouldn't be THAT impossible he lasts untill #26. Picking Jack Conklin would be a headscratcher though. I don't think he fits us at all and we wouldn't pick him if Spriggs, Nkemdiche and Rankins were all still on the board.
Yeah, Decekr would be a no brainer for me, and I can't imagine Conklin is even on the board. But I didn't think Britt was much of a Seahawk propect either, so who knows.

I do wonder how they would rate Decker compared to Spriggs. Decker his far more polished in his overall game, but Spriggs has that high upside athletic ability.

Decker is a natural RT and a very good one at that. Picking him ensures you there won't be any problems there for years to come. However, that would leave the more important LT position a bit undermanned. Spriggs isn't as sure to succeed as Decker but I do think he has a higher ceiling as LT.

If we get a FA LT then I'd prefer Decker and if not I'd rather have Spriggs.
 
Top