Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Matos was there

Discuss your thoughts about anything College Football or NFL draft. Recruiting, Projections, and Mock drafts, Etc. LANGUAGE: PG-13
Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:45 pm
  • Gross-Matos was there and u pass for a guy u could of probably got in the second. Yes it was arguably a need but I hope they know something about the pass rush.
    thegreeninyoureye
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 860
    Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:47 pm


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:03 pm
  • Epenesa was there too and Queen was ranked a lot higher. We gifted him to theRavens.
    vonstout
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 401
    Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2013 10:00 pm


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:18 pm
  • Anyone think this gives Clowney and/or Griff some extra leverage?
    At least the Rams didn't smoke us in first round.
    Frikken Niners sure did. And the Cards did very well too.
    I'm thinking we may need to abolish our electoral college system and go with popular vote when it comes to the draft. :)
    Last edited by Appyhawk on Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
    Appyhawk
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1287
    Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:43 pm
    Location: Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montana.


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:22 pm
  • Appyhawk wrote:Anyone think this gives Clowney and/or Griff some extra leverage?


    I think Seattle goes into the preseason with Mayowa and Irvin as there starting DE before they overpay anyone.
    getnasty
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4539
    Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:22 pm


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:28 pm
  • Lol same year same reaction. They know more than u guys do.
    gowazzu02
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1766
    Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 10:32 am


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:29 pm
  • Brooks is pretty fast. Maybe they can feed him up and fire him unblocked off the edge.
    Appyhawk
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1287
    Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:43 pm
    Location: Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montana.


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:30 pm
  • gowazzu02 wrote:Lol same year same reaction. They know more than u guys do.

    Do they???? You can say they haven't hit on a 1st rounder since Earl. Lol yeah the reaction is the same ever year because they reach. There reaches are more misses than hits so yeah the reaction is the same every year.
    Last edited by thegreeninyoureye on Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    thegreeninyoureye
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 860
    Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:47 pm


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:32 pm
  • gowazzu02 wrote:Lol same year same reaction. They know more than u guys do.


    I give them credit for that all the time. Hope it's true! lol

    But come to think of it, how did it turn out last year?
    Appyhawk
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1287
    Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:43 pm
    Location: Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montana.


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:38 pm
  • thegreeninyoureye wrote:
    gowazzu02 wrote:Lol same year same reaction. They know more than u guys do.

    Do they???? You can say they haven't hit on a 1st rounder since Earl. Lol yeah the reaction is the same ever year because they reach. There reaches are more misses than hits so yeah the reaction is the same every year.


    We might have a shot at a C- grade for this pick if you put on some rose-colored lenses.
    NJlargent
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1819
    Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 3:02 pm


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 9:50 pm
  • I'd argue it's a safe pick over a complete reach.
    Grahamhawker
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2284
    Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:19 pm
    Location: Graham, WA


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:40 pm
  • ~sigh~

    Smellyman
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5789
    Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:58 pm
    Location: Taipei


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:40 pm
  • Grahamhawker wrote:I'd argue it's a safe pick over a complete reach.

    Yep.
    Sports Hernia
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 30808
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:36 pm
    Location: The pit


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 10:46 pm
  • Grahamhawker wrote:I'd argue it's a safe pick over a complete reach.


    Curry-esque safe?
    Smellyman
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5789
    Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:58 pm
    Location: Taipei


Re: Matos was there
Thu Apr 23, 2020 11:55 pm
  • At least we didnt take a RB
    Subzero717
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 9990
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


Re: Matos was there
Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:08 am
  • Smellyman wrote:
    Grahamhawker wrote:I'd argue it's a safe pick over a complete reach.


    Curry-esque safe?



    God I hope not.
    Grahamhawker
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2284
    Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 2:19 pm
    Location: Graham, WA


Re: Matos was there
Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:25 am
  • thegreeninyoureye wrote:Gross-Matos was there and u pass for a guy u could of probably got in the second. Yes it was arguably a need but I hope they know something about the pass rush.

    Incorrect he wouldn't have been there. Probably wouldn't have made it out of the 1st round. this kid is a serious baller.
    Chukarhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2607
    Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:14 pm


Re: Matos was there
Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:34 am
  • Guess what guys, Matos and Eponesa (sp?) are also available to be picked later as well. As all 32 teams passed on them despite playing what the 3rd most important, maybe 2nd most important position in the game.

    And for those poo pooing the Collier pick, it was a pick for need last year. And still not a complete story yet.

    Penny, was breaking out before an injury.

    Ifedi started every game and despite his warts, got paid pretty well in the off season

    The drafts an inexact science. All I know is Pete and JS win,,,, every year. And no matter who they pick, people on here will complain about it.
    gowazzu02
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1766
    Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2014 10:32 am


Re: Matos was there
Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:36 am
  • Matos is still avaible for a reason.
    Subzero717
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 9990
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


Re: Matos was there
Fri Apr 24, 2020 3:25 pm
  • Subzero717 wrote:Matos is still avaible for a reason.
    Not necessarily, DK almost slipped into 3rd rd, Russ did slipped into 3rd. Just because matos is still available means just that, he is available.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    toffee
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2308
    Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2016 8:44 pm


Re: Matos was there
Fri Apr 24, 2020 4:12 pm
  • Chukarhawk wrote:
    thegreeninyoureye wrote:Gross-Matos was there and u pass for a guy u could of probably got in the second. Yes it was arguably a need but I hope they know something about the pass rush.

    Incorrect he wouldn't have been there. Probably wouldn't have made it out of the 1st round. this kid is a serious baller.

    Trey Wingo mentioned Brooks before the draft started on Friday. He said Cincy would have taken him based on his Senior Bowl which Cincy coached.
    TreeRon
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1201
    Joined: Sun Nov 05, 2017 5:48 pm


Re: Matos was there
Fri Apr 24, 2020 5:05 pm
  • TreeRon wrote:
    Chukarhawk wrote:
    thegreeninyoureye wrote:Gross-Matos was there and u pass for a guy u could of probably got in the second. Yes it was arguably a need but I hope they know something about the pass rush.

    Incorrect he wouldn't have been there. Probably wouldn't have made it out of the 1st round. this kid is a serious baller.

    Trey Wingo mentioned Brooks before the draft started on Friday. He said Cincy would have taken him based on his Senior Bowl which Cincy coached.


    Yep. Brooks is a picture perfect match for Cincy, who is likely switching to a 3-4. Brooks was not going to fall far past 27 whatsoever.
    Maelstrom787
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3365
    Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 1:38 pm
    Location: Delaware


Re: Matos was there
Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:42 pm
  • toffee wrote:
    Subzero717 wrote:Matos is still avaible for a reason.
    Not necessarily, DK almost slipped into 3rd rd, Russ did slipped into 3rd. Just because matos is still available means just that, he is available.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


    There are reasons they went where they did too. They were able to overcome them but that doesnt mean there werent reasons that 32 teams passed on them.
    Subzero717
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 9990
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything




It is currently Thu Sep 24, 2020 1:23 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests