I voted "no", but really that is more of a "status quo" type vote. I don't see any changes really coming.
I see almost equal parts of playcalling, offense design, and execution itself as being the fault of why our offense is not doing as well as it should be
Offense design, the plays are pretty simple and it relies on execution. It's not too bad, it's got us to two SBs. I cannot really seeing this changing a lot
Execution, I blame a lot of this on Russell. He only plays up to the level we expect when he's reacting, not thinking. I don't think it has to do with no-huddle. It's just not getting in his own head. This tends to happen as the game gets down to the wire. Second blame goes to the O-line, just lack of experience together. But mostly on Russell.
Playcalling, definitely think there should be a different playcaller. I question a lot more plays this year than I realize. However, I don't think it's as super bad as others think: again some of these are actually really good plays that are executed poorly (a lot of inaccurate throws by Russell for example)
The unfortunate part: I can't really see anything changing with offense design or playcalling. The only thing I see changing is execution, and that is because it will get better with time. With better execution, that will by association also make the playcalling and offensive design not look so bad. It's just whether or not we'll see it soon enough to make the playoffs.
So really my vote, just status quo.