Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE: PG-13
Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 06, 2020 4:43 pm

Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 06, 2020 4:49 pm
  • Mizak wrote:https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/29143390/source-reunion-jadeveon-clowney-seahawks-not-likely

    Damn. JS referring to Clowney in the past tense.

    That’s what I’m thinking as well. Go get Griffin.
    Sports Hernia
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 28920
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:36 pm
    Location: The pit


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 06, 2020 5:45 pm
  • They're pretty clearly still waiting for him with the moves to clear some $$. The defense is worse without him and he's the 'tilt the field' player Pete loves. This might be their response to his interview about loving the team, coaches, culture, etc but not signing. Seems like they're both playing games now. There's a good chance this bleeds into training camp.
    mistaowen
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5542
    Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 2:54 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 06, 2020 8:43 pm
  • mistaowen wrote:They're pretty clearly still waiting for him with the moves to clear some $$. The defense is worse without him and he's the 'tilt the field' player Pete loves. This might be their response to his interview about loving the team, coaches, culture, etc but not signing. Seems like they're both playing games now. There's a good chance this bleeds into training camp.


    Agree. This about face article is just another media change of direction, like a school of fish changing direction while still caught in a one direction current. Less than 24 hours ago the same outlet came to exactly the opposite conclusion from the same interviews. This is what happens when news is hard to come by.
    I know what I want to happen, and I'll keep wanting that to happen until it can't.
    Appyhawk
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1016
    Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:43 pm
    Location: Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montana.


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 06, 2020 9:48 pm
  • Eh, it's all talk at this point. Negotiations come in waves; my emotions won't get beached until I see Jadeveon hanging 10 on another team's surfboard.
    Somos doces
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 18
    Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2020 9:27 pm
    Location: Southeast Washington


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 06, 2020 10:45 pm
  • ,#1 Tennessee
    #2 Cleveland
    #3 Seattle :x
    metwelve
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 19
    Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:08 pm


Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 07, 2020 6:19 am
  • He speaks well of Seattle and his time here.

    I’m still optimistic/hopeful.
    Video is worth watching.

    pmedic920
    * .NET Official Stache *
     
    Posts: 20738
    Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:37 am
    Location: On the lake, Livingston Texas


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 07, 2020 6:41 am
  • Good fresh addition to the conversation pmed. Just the sort of thing that could fan the flames on this deal.
    Appyhawk
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1016
    Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:43 pm
    Location: Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montana.


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 07, 2020 11:45 am
  • I'm tired of caring about these players and their contract demands. Move ON. Another guy is coming to replace you, yeah, even YOU the reader of this.
    Largent80
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 36609
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 1:38 pm
    Location: The Tex-ASS


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 07, 2020 1:14 pm
  • If he REALLY wanted to play here, he'd be here by now. Period. End of story.
    WarHawks
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 116
    Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:35 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 07, 2020 3:46 pm

Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 07, 2020 3:47 pm
  • WarHawks wrote:If he REALLY wanted to play here, he'd be here by now. Period. End of story.


    Possibly but not absolutely.

    He may really want to play for Seattle but not at the cost of 2,3,4 million less per year.

    Edit:
    And I’m sure that length of contract matters to him as well.
    pmedic920
    * .NET Official Stache *
     
    Posts: 20738
    Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:37 am
    Location: On the lake, Livingston Texas


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 07, 2020 4:40 pm
  • Big news last month.
    xray
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2861
    Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2018 6:29 am
    Location: AZ


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 07, 2020 8:35 pm
  • Yeah... don't think he'll be with us. I was hoping we could've got both Clowney and Griffen, but I just don't think that'll happen now.
    nrayorr
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 335
    Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 12:32 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 07, 2020 10:14 pm
  • hawkfan68 wrote:
    WarHawks wrote:If he REALLY wanted to play here, he'd be here by now. Period. End of story.


    Not necessarily. Jarran Reed did squat last year and still got a new contract which gives him $14M this season (which is a raise from his previous year). Why should Clowney take less? Clowney made $15M last season between the Seahawks and Texans. He's not going to stay for any amount lower than that. He shouldn't have to. Doesn't mean that he doesn't want to play here. Even Russell Wilson wouldn't take what he feels is bare minimum.

    Jadeveon Clowney - https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seahawks/jadeveon-clowney-14410/cash-earnings/

    Jarran Reed - https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seahawks/jarran-reed-18998/cash-earnings/



    But Russell Wilson has never missed a game and is arguably one of the top couple of quarterbacks
    In the league. You cant count on Clowney and he ended up with 3.5 sacks. He took over one game .
    One.

    He wants 18 million for that?
    He wants top tier Defensive end money .
    morgulon1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4649
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:07 am
    Location: Spokane, Wa


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Fri May 08, 2020 8:15 am
  • He's gone and I have come to accept it.
    We can't just pay out huge contracts to everyone after all
    the ones we currently have and not weaken the team overall.
    IndyHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5419
    Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 2:42 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Fri May 08, 2020 8:51 am
  • Appyhawk wrote:
    mistaowen wrote:They're pretty clearly still waiting for him with the moves to clear some $$. The defense is worse without him and he's the 'tilt the field' player Pete loves. This might be their response to his interview about loving the team, coaches, culture, etc but not signing. Seems like they're both playing games now. There's a good chance this bleeds into training camp.


    Agree. This about face article is just another media change of direction, like a school of fish changing direction while still caught in a one direction current.

    Less than 24 hours ago the same outlet came to exactly the opposite conclusion from the same interviews. This is what happens when news is hard to come by.

    I know what I want to happen, and I'll keep wanting that to happen until it can't.



    Bingo. Sports radio shows behind the scenes "Please give us something to talk about!"

    That "past tense" reference was brought up a couple of days ago, took them that long to spot it and say "HERE'S A STORY!"

    No games being played, just 2 sides being patient and going about their business, while radio and print desperately look to invent talking points.

    I'm ambivalent. I see Clowney looking at how he handled it last year, how it turned out best for him, and thinking "Why not be patient again this year?"

    Some DE is going to get hurt early on, and Clowney will get close to the deal he wants. He prefers to come back to Seattle, and I believe that if the dollars are close, he will come back to Seattle. I don't see Clowney as the petty type. It's all about the fun of the game and the dollars for him.
    ivotuk
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 20104
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:29 pm
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Fri May 08, 2020 9:01 am
  • Appyhawk wrote:
    mistaowen wrote:They're pretty clearly still waiting for him with the moves to clear some $$. The defense is worse without him and he's the 'tilt the field' player Pete loves. This might be their response to his interview about loving the team, coaches, culture, etc but not signing. Seems like they're both playing games now. There's a good chance this bleeds into training camp.


    Agree. This about face article is just another media change of direction, like a school of fish changing direction while still caught in a one direction current. Less than 24 hours ago the same outlet came to exactly the opposite conclusion from the same interviews. This is what happens when news is hard to come by.
    I know what I want to happen, and I'll keep wanting that to happen until it can't.


    We're clearing space to sign another DE or DT, doesn't mean it's Clowney. Vernon, Griffen, Sheard, Covington, Snacks Harrison. All still available.

    Or two if it's not Clowney. Obviously he's #1, but again doesn't mean we're clearing cap specifically for him. He's obviously dug his heels in and isn't budging on his salary demands. So come June/July we will sign one or two of these other guys.
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 17102
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:10 am


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Fri May 08, 2020 12:57 pm
  • morgulon1 wrote:
    hawkfan68 wrote:
    WarHawks wrote:If he REALLY wanted to play here, he'd be here by now. Period. End of story.


    Not necessarily. Jarran Reed did squat last year and still got a new contract which gives him $14M this season (which is a raise from his previous year). Why should Clowney take less? Clowney made $15M last season between the Seahawks and Texans. He's not going to stay for any amount lower than that. He shouldn't have to. Doesn't mean that he doesn't want to play here. Even Russell Wilson wouldn't take what he feels is bare minimum.

    Jadeveon Clowney - https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seahawks/jadeveon-clowney-14410/cash-earnings/

    Jarran Reed - https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seahawks/jarran-reed-18998/cash-earnings/



    But Russell Wilson has never missed a game and is arguably one of the top couple of quarterbacks
    In the league. You cant count on Clowney and he ended up with 3.5 sacks. He took over one game .
    One.


    He wants 18 million for that?
    He wants top tier Defensive end money .


    Do you actually watch games or review the stat line? With the statement you made, it seems the latter. He was the most keyed on player on the DL. He was the best player on that line. He took over more than just one game. He also took over the playoff game against the Eagles (with a core injury). Teams double teamed him and he was still able to be disruptive. Rasheem and QJeff's benefited from Clowney getting attention and double-teamed. He also had two interceptions for TDs. He was clearly in the top 2 or 3 of the defensive players on the team, if not the best. This is all with having to learn the system on the go and then getting injured. Playing with that injury, which would end the season for most players, for most of the latter half of the season. He was still making big impact even though his stats don't show it.He is the guy offenses have to gameplan for upfront. Without him, the Seahawks don't have that guy on the DL.

    Reed got a raise to $14M for doing nothing. He produced more than Reed did last season and is only being offered the same or less. That's not justified at all. He may not be worth over $20M but he has done enough to warrant something around $17-18M range.

    Leonard Williams is earning $16M/yr and produced .5 sacks last season. In his best season (thus far in his career), only had 7 sacks.
    https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/new-york-giants/leonard-williams-16730/stats-valuation/
    Last edited by hawkfan68 on Fri May 08, 2020 3:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
    hawkfan68
    Gold Supporter
    Gold Supporter
     
    Posts: 7732
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:10 pm
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Fri May 08, 2020 1:59 pm
  • Seems like Seattle should be to sign him to a 1 year deal with incentives give him 13 million with the chance to earn 17 if he plays in 13 games and has 8 sacks.
    getnasty
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4423
    Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:22 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Fri May 08, 2020 2:16 pm
  • I think Clowney reunion is highly likely.

    Clowney needs to find out his top dollar value after doing physical exams with teams after Covid-19 stay at home orders lift and he can visit interested teams.

    The Seahawks have not brought in backup QB, 'DT's, veteran RB, or nickel CB for competition . This tells me they are waiting for Clowney to find out his top dollar offer when health verified. Will another team offer higher that Seahawks are unwilling to match. I doubt it.

    I think Seahawks would like to sign him for 2 year deal and not have to go through same dance again next year. Perhaps some other team will offer a higher one year deal and he doesn't return.
    springscohawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 123
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:01 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Fri May 08, 2020 5:10 pm
  • I think that most of us want to turn the page on Clowney and look at the players the Hawks have on the team now . IMO
    xray
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2861
    Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2018 6:29 am
    Location: AZ


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Fri May 08, 2020 10:42 pm
  • hawkfan68 wrote:
    morgulon1 wrote:
    hawkfan68 wrote:
    WarHawks wrote:If he REALLY wanted to play here, he'd be here by now. Period. End of story.


    Not necessarily. Jarran Reed did squat last year and still got a new contract which gives him $14M this season (which is a raise from his previous year). Why should Clowney take less? Clowney made $15M last season between the Seahawks and Texans. He's not going to stay for any amount lower than that. He shouldn't have to. Doesn't mean that he doesn't want to play here. Even Russell Wilson wouldn't take what he feels is bare minimum.

    Jadeveon Clowney - https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seahawks/jadeveon-clowney-14410/cash-earnings/

    Jarran Reed - https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/seattle-seahawks/jarran-reed-18998/cash-earnings/



    But Russell Wilson has never missed a game and is arguably one of the top couple of quarterbacks
    In the league. You cant count on Clowney and he ended up with 3.5 sacks. He took over one game .
    One.


    He wants 18 million for that?
    He wants top tier Defensive end money .


    Do you actually watch games or review the stat line? With the statement you made, it seems the latter. He was the most keyed on player on the DL. He was the best player on that line. He took over more than just one game. He also took over the playoff game against the Eagles (with a core injury). Teams double teamed him and he was still able to be disruptive. Rasheem and QJeff's benefited from Clowney getting attention and double-teamed. He also had two interceptions for TDs. He was clearly in the top 2 or 3 of the defensive players on the team, if not the best. This is all with having to learn the system on the go and then getting injured. Playing with that injury, which would end the season for most players, for most of the latter half of the season. He was still making big impact even though his stats don't show it.He is the guy offenses have to gameplan for upfront. Without him, the Seahawks don't have that guy on the DL.

    Reed got a raise to $14M for doing nothing. He produced more than Reed did last season and is only being offered the same or less. That's not justified at all. He may not be worth over $20M but he has done enough to warrant something around $17-18M range.

    Leonard Williams is earning $16M/yr and produced .5 sacks last season. In his best season (thus far in his career), only had 7 sacks.
    https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/new-york-giants/leonard-williams-16730/stats-valuation/


    No man. I watch the games (thanks for the jab anyways haha)
    Part of your argument for aigning Clowney is that some other team is over paying for a guy that didnt produce. Bad logic IMHO. I guess the people who make these decisions are going to have to decide if its worth bringing him back.

    A couple of posts above had a great idea of a base salary of 13 m with incentives up to 18 m
    If he produces. Sorry i didnt catch who posted it
    But that seems to make a lot of sense.

    *Get nasty said that
    morgulon1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4649
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 11:07 am
    Location: Spokane, Wa


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Sat May 09, 2020 12:37 pm
  • At this point, I would rather the Seahawks move on from Clowney and either sign Griffin, or make a move to trade for Yannick Ngokoue (preferably both). Ngokoue may be the better pure pash rusher anyways and would certainly fit our gaping hole at that position all while filling a long-term need.
    cjamesg
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 9
    Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2018 1:47 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Sat May 09, 2020 1:01 pm
  • cjamesg wrote:At this point, I would rather the Seahawks move on from Clowney and either sign Griffin, or make a move to trade for Yannick Ngokoue (preferably both). Ngokoue may be the better pure pash rusher anyways and would certainly fit our gaping hole at that position all while filling a long-term need.


    The cost for Ngakoue is higher than Clowney. Not only do they have to trade high picks for him, they would need to sign him to a contract. He wants something close to $20M/yr too.
    hawkfan68
    Gold Supporter
    Gold Supporter
     
    Posts: 7732
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:10 pm
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Tue May 12, 2020 5:04 am
  • With the drafting of Brooks and Taylor, I don't see where Ngakoue really fits into the overall scheme. Clowney, or maybe Griffin, seem to be a better fit to me.

    I still hope we can retain Clowney, on a team friendly deal, and I still think we have the inside track on that.
    bigskydoc
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2776
    Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 10:27 am
    Location: Kalispell, MT


Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Tue May 12, 2020 10:20 am
  • Clowney and JJ Watt.

    I’ve watched them both closely for a few years.

    Sacks are NOT the only “stat” that needs to be looked at.

    Guys like these demand attention, a lot of time that means a double team.

    Clowney is worth way more that what his “sacks” say he’s worth.

    YMMV
    pmedic920
    * .NET Official Stache *
     
    Posts: 20738
    Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:37 am
    Location: On the lake, Livingston Texas


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Mon May 25, 2020 5:15 am
  • With Hyde's coming and another veteran WR on the table -would rather Gordon than Brown-, I think that Seahawks still miss a veteran and low-priced DT and a good DE. If Clowney is not going to be signed, Griffin or another similar. But it could be the piece Seattle lacks of to complete the whole picture. And even there, we are able to compete, hard to think about that as a favourite or a serious threat
    luis.hdhoyo
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 1
    Joined: Mon May 25, 2020 5:08 am


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Mon May 25, 2020 8:42 am
  • luis.hdhoyo wrote:With Hyde's coming and another veteran WR on the table -would rather Gordon than Brown-, I think that Seahawks still miss a veteran and low-priced DT and a good DE. If Clowney is not going to be signed, Griffin or another similar. But it could be the piece Seattle lacks of to complete the whole picture. And even there, we are able to compete, hard to think about that as a favourite or a serious threat


    Nice first post luis. Great to have you on board.
    I like the idea of Snacks, but we really NEED Clowney. Can we somehow swing getting both?
    Appyhawk
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1016
    Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:43 pm
    Location: Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montana.


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Mon May 25, 2020 1:51 pm
  • I'm thinking signing Griffen and not Clowney is more likely at this point. Would love Clowney back though.

    Hard pass on AB. But if Russ is pushing for it....just don't think he would agree to what we could pay him.

    Gordon at the vet min would be a risk I'd take. Barring his off the field antics, he could've been a HOFer. Maybe this time around, that will sink in. He's got plenty of mileage left in the tank.

    I asked a friend (Raiders fan) what he though of a WR corps of Lockett, Metcalf, Gordon, and AB and he looked sick to his stomach...
    Elemas
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 395
    Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 1:02 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Mon May 25, 2020 2:00 pm
  • Elemas wrote:I'm thinking signing Griffen and not Clowney is more likely at this point. Would love Clowney back though.

    Hard pass on AB. But if Russ is pushing for it....just don't think he would agree to what we could pay him.

    Gordon at the vet min would be a risk I'd take. Barring his off the field antics, he could've been a HOFer. Maybe this time around, that will sink in. He's got plenty of mileage left in the tank.

    I asked a friend (Raiders fan) what he though of a WR corps of Lockett, Metcalf, Gordon, and AB and he looked sick to his stomach...


    Well if we are going to field such a weak ass DL, we are going to have to win a bunch of shootouts. Maybe shoring up the WR corps is the way to go. But I'm not sure a signing drug addict and a sociopath are the way to do it.
    Mad Dog
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1789
    Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2015 8:12 am


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Mon May 25, 2020 2:56 pm
  • Totally agree with you but, it's not all that far-fetched right now.
    Elemas
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 395
    Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 1:02 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Mon May 25, 2020 5:35 pm
  • I'm sure they will sign one or two second rate journeyman defensive linemen off of waivers and there will be those here that will applaud the effort. They have completely blown the cap this off season. It really is as big of a failure of an off season as I have seen in 20 years (when they were not completely up against the cap.)
    JayhawkMike
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 362
    Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:06 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Mon May 25, 2020 9:18 pm
  • JayhawkMike wrote:I'm sure they will sign one or two second rate journeyman defensive linemen off of waivers and there will be those here that will applaud the effort. They have completely blown the cap this off season. It really is as big of a failure of an off season as I have seen in 20 years (when they were not completely up against the cap.)

    Can you explain in what area the cap was "completely blown"?
    TAB420
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 765
    Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:11 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Mon May 25, 2020 10:12 pm
  • Not a single difference maker. No player that was great at his former team (besides one that might be going to jail/suspended.) They all seem to have injury or age issues. Of course Pete doesn’t want a ripe, juicy Orange he’d rather have the old empty rind on the team. JS’s GM production this year reminds me of Colliers on field production last year.
    JayhawkMike
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 362
    Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2016 4:06 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Tue May 26, 2020 7:35 am
  • JayhawkMike wrote:Not a single difference maker. No player that was great at his former team (besides one that might be going to jail/suspended.) They all seem to have injury or age issues. Of course Pete doesn’t want a ripe, juicy Orange he’d rather have the old empty rind on the team. JS’s GM production this year reminds me of Colliers on field production last year.

    Oh how I wish I could disagree with your post, Jayhawk. But I just can't. I've always been a big fan of John and Pete and still am, but the moves made this year are complete head scratchers.
    We went into this offseason with considerable cap to spend and we have spent it without making a lot of progress.
    We got 3 guys on the market who figure to fill obvious holes.
    Our first move should have been to get the Clowney deal done. That changes the scope of draft for us. Still could have taken one of our 1st 2 picks, and then drafted a serious RB to plug a glaring weakness, Taylor to be specific. We would still have been in position to get most of the guys we got anyway, none of which helped our OT need, or our DT need, or our desire for a bigtime receiver, or a big time CB. Now we're back to looking at the difference maker we got for corner being a no show. I like the Hyde signing, but he cost us double what Taylor would have. Is Hyde twice as good? Maybe he is today, but adding another injured player to our stable as top tier doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The notion it is unwise to expend higher draft picks on a RB doesn't make sense to me either. Virtually nothing about this Seahawk off season has made a lot of sense to me.
    Appyhawk
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1016
    Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:43 pm
    Location: Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montana.


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Tue May 26, 2020 9:44 am
  • JayhawkMike wrote:Not a single difference maker. No player that was great at his former team (besides one that might be going to jail/suspended.) They all seem to have injury or age issues. Of course Pete doesn’t want a ripe, juicy Orange he’d rather have the old empty rind on the team. JS’s GM production this year reminds me of Colliers on field production last year.


    Too many needs this off season to go spend 75% of our available cap space on the big flashy free agents.

    - O-line
    - D-line
    - LB
    - DB
    - RB
    - TE
    - WR

    Hell, it would have been a shorter post if I listed the position groups where were didn't have immediate need and depth.

    This is what happens when the majority of your draft picks over the past 2-3 years don't turn into impact players. You have to address the same needs over and over every off season.
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 17102
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 11:10 am


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Tue May 26, 2020 10:23 am
  • In the end picking at or near the end of the 1st rd. puts the substantial likelihood of swinging and missing on your initial picks. There certainly haven't been many hits recently.

    The team's recent trading of early picks for players that they cannot re-sign for cap reasons is another huge concern but the team sometimes gets a short term gain from the moves. This situation is unfortunately not very sustainable and then the seeming effect is there is not much quality depth apparent on the roster. Long term the quality players not drafted are just not there on the roster nor are the big players unable to be kept.

    I'd love to see the team re-sign Clowney but am like many others here dubious it will happen. In terms of cost to benefit the player is a quality player who at times makes a difference and does get elite level pressure numbers but isn't a sack artist. Is Clowney worth the $ he apparently wants? I doubt it and so does the FO. In result the impasse continues and Clowney is unlikely to be signed by the Hawks unless there is a softening of his wage demands. I suspect signing for less would be long term advantageous to both sides but Clowney seems quite dug in with his position.

    He signs, or he doesn't sign, it is what it is.
    jammerhawk
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 6977
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:13 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Tue May 26, 2020 10:26 am
  • Appyhawk wrote:
    JayhawkMike wrote:Not a single difference maker. No player that was great at his former team (besides one that might be going to jail/suspended.) They all seem to have injury or age issues. Of course Pete doesn’t want a ripe, juicy Orange he’d rather have the old empty rind on the team. JS’s GM production this year reminds me of Colliers on field production last year.

    Oh how I wish I could disagree with your post, Jayhawk. But I just can't. I've always been a big fan of John and Pete and still am, but the moves made this year are complete head scratchers.
    We went into this offseason with considerable cap to spend and we have spent it without making a lot of progress.
    We got 3 guys on the market who figure to fill obvious holes.
    Our first move should have been to get the Clowney deal done. That changes the scope of draft for us. Still could have taken one of our 1st 2 picks, and then drafted a serious RB to plug a glaring weakness, Taylor to be specific. We would still have been in position to get most of the guys we got anyway, none of which helped our OT need, or our DT need, or our desire for a bigtime receiver, or a big time CB. Now we're back to looking at the difference maker we got for corner being a no show. I like the Hyde signing, but he cost us double what Taylor would have. Is Hyde twice as good? Maybe he is today, but adding another injured player to our stable as top tier doesn't make a lot of sense to me. The notion it is unwise to expend higher draft picks on a RB doesn't make sense to me either. Virtually nothing about this Seahawk off season has made a lot of sense to me.


    Agree. I was hoping for Taylor or Dillon as well. Sans Brooks, most of our picks would've likely ranged the same (talent wise) after rounds 1-2.

    The Olsen $$$ confuses me. Not that there wasn't a need but, if Uncle Will is back...and Hollister were there as well, it would be ok.

    I semi-agree with taking RBs in rounds 1-2 but, we did it with Penny. Then again, there's so many holes on this team. When your pics don't pan out as well as they should, it starts to accumulate rather fast. Every team experiences this but the Hawks have had more than their fair share in recent years.
    Elemas
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 395
    Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 1:02 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Tue May 26, 2020 10:45 am
  • JayhawkMike wrote:Not a single difference maker. No player that was great at his former team (besides one that might be going to jail/suspended.) They all seem to have injury or age issues. Of course Pete doesn’t want a ripe, juicy Orange he’d rather have the old empty rind on the team. JS’s GM production this year reminds me of Colliers on field production last year.


    I think this is an over reach but everyone is entitled to their own view.

    I think this offseason has been unusual in many ways. For the first time in a few years the team has not given away early draft picks for some guy the can't likely re-sign like Clowney or Richardson or you name it. They've signed lots of guys to compete for higher $ positions with the hope of scoring. It will remain to be seen how their draft works out but for that we need to wait a few seasons. Make no mistake however, trading for Clowney or Richardson or others and then being unable to re-sign them is equally as bad as draft a player like McDowell who doesn't ever play a down. It's very short term thinking as the team winds up with less than zippo when the player traded for can't be re-signed, if they can't put them selves into a Comp pick situation.

    If you are referring to FA signings and the team not finding a difference maker, perhaps this is so. What is not happening though is the team is not crippling itself financially with weak FA signings and seems to go with players who could have a high potential of providing some help. It isn't flashy by any means. It also may not work.

    It's still a long time before the games will be played and the whole picture may look a lot better by then.
    jammerhawk
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 6977
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:13 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 27, 2020 12:30 pm

Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 27, 2020 12:41 pm
  • They only have 9m in cap...if so, we should match the offer.
    TAB420
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 765
    Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 4:11 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 27, 2020 2:06 pm
  • Appyhawk wrote:Uh oh...new suitor entering competition for Clowney?
    https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/292 ... -away-team


    Noah Spence is a depth guy at best for the Saints. He was inactive for the games they had him last season. They have Davenport and Jordan. Highly doubt they are a threat to sign Clowney. However stranger things have occurred before.
    hawkfan68
    Gold Supporter
    Gold Supporter
     
    Posts: 7732
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:10 pm
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 27, 2020 6:01 pm

Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Wed May 27, 2020 6:32 pm

Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 28, 2020 12:31 am
  • I think he really wants to come back here, but the hawks are just low balling him and he is waiting for some fair numbers.
    Seajam
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 10
    Joined: Fri Feb 07, 2020 12:17 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 28, 2020 7:44 am
  • Seajam wrote:I think he really wants to come back here, but the hawks are just low balling him and he is waiting for some fair numbers.


    Bingo.
    Appyhawk
    Silver Supporter
    Silver Supporter
     
    Posts: 1016
    Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2019 8:43 pm
    Location: Ranch in Flint Hills of Kansas, formerly NW Montana.


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 28, 2020 8:17 am
  • the Seahawks are negotiating from a position of strength. let him sit and stew
    Chukarhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2604
    Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 5:14 pm


Re: Seahawks-Clowney reunion not likely
Thu May 28, 2020 9:21 am
  • Cleveland offered the most money, but it is Cleveland, I really think he is waiting to be able to get physicals and checked out to create a more balanced appraisal as well as a destination he wants to be at.

    He went from the Texans to here, he likes it here, time is on his side, he knows as the season approaches teams looking for a edge guy will be apt to pay if they have the cap room. Dallas, Rams, hell Arizona are all places that could use him and are set to contend. Low man are the Rams due to cap hell. Maybe Oakland as well, they are going to be marketing darlings for a few years now with their new better then AT&T stadium..
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 31605
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.




It is currently Tue Jul 14, 2020 6:21 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ SEATTLE SEAHAWKS FOOTBALL ]




Information
  • Who is online