| Author |
Message |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn?  Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:04 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5208
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
|
Why do people still think that Flynn is actually valuable? Maybe he could net us a conditional 5th in a trade or something, but no more........
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
warden
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm
Posts: 1797
|
chris98251 wrote: Montana needed Taylor and Clark and Jones to compliment Rice, but point of your statement is correct, you need guys that can seperate and catch the ball.
Most also had a decent rushing attack, James with Manning, Tyler, Craig, Watters in S.F., Warner Faulk, Bradshaw Blier and some Italian guy named Harris, Smith in Dallas, Marino was the only one that really had no rushing attack, and by chance the only one on that list not to win a Superbowl. The ultimate team game
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Battle #83
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:35 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:42 pm
Posts: 227
Location: Rival Country
|
|
i think you're thinking Fitzpatrick and not fitzgerald
_________________  sig by Ramster
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawkfan509
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:02 pm |
|
| *SILVER SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 1016
Location: Tri-Cities
|
SPOHAWK wrote: If my grandma had wheels, she'd be a trolley! You could tape a Cheetah to her back. Just sayin
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksSoc
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 542
Location: Ireland!
|
Hawkfan509 wrote: SPOHAWK wrote: If my grandma had wheels, she'd be a trolley! You could tape a Cheetah to her back. Just sayin If we take this concept and apply it to football we could be on to something, Niners think Kap is fast? Lets see him outrun an angry Browner strapped to an even angrier cheetah.
_________________
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." Mark Twain.
"Beast Mode is artist, puny Saints Defense merely his canvas!"
"When you die the only kingdom you'll see, will be two foot wide and six foot deep!"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawks46
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 3181
|
|
No way would I improve the Cardinals to the point of making them the next NFC West Powerhouse !
Oh, and on the whole "QBs needing elite WRs to be successful" point.....
Brady hasn't had an elite WR outside of Moss for one year. They've trotted out tons of journeymen in and out of that system and that QB. Brady made Welker elite, not the other way around. Branch was borderline elite when he was in NE, but he came here and showed he was merely above average. Went back to NE with Brady and bang! he's good again.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sturg78
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:01 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm
Posts: 1047
|
Basis4day wrote:
Do you realize HOW expensive we're talking for Fitz?
2013: $5 million (+ $10 million option bonus due 3/15), 2014: $12.75 million, 2015: $8 million (+ $8 million roster bonus), 2016: $15 million, 2017-2018: $14.75 million, 2019: Free Agent
Dang. That is steep.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:04 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9923
|
Hawks46 wrote: No way would I improve the Cardinals to the point of making them the next NFC West Powerhouse !
Oh, and on the whole "QBs needing elite WRs to be successful" point.....
Brady hasn't had an elite WR outside of Moss for one year. They've trotted out tons of journeymen in and out of that system and that QB. Brady made Welker elite, not the other way around. Branch was borderline elite when he was in NE, but he came here and showed he was merely above average. Went back to NE with Brady and bang! he's good again. Eli doesn't have squat either. Its laughable how overrated whatever WR he plays with becomes.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:32 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 4289
|
|
Flynn for Fitz? I think we'd be giving up too much.. Maybe Flynn for Fitz, Peterson and Dockett.. plus 4 1sts
_________________
February 2, 2014... the day the dream was finally realized
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:43 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10041
|
pehawk wrote: Hawks46 wrote: No way would I improve the Cardinals to the point of making them the next NFC West Powerhouse !
Oh, and on the whole "QBs needing elite WRs to be successful" point.....
Brady hasn't had an elite WR outside of Moss for one year. They've trotted out tons of journeymen in and out of that system and that QB. Brady made Welker elite, not the other way around. Branch was borderline elite when he was in NE, but he came here and showed he was merely above average. Went back to NE with Brady and bang! he's good again. Eli doesn't have squat either. Its laughable how overrated whatever WR he plays with becomes. You are underselling Nicks and Cruz.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:48 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
|
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9923
|
|
No I am not. I'd catch 800 and 7 TD's with Eli.
Classic Deon Branch syndrome, except neither of those two were ever talented enough to be drafted in round 1.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:49 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3090
|
warden wrote: DavidSeven wrote: but truly elite QBs don't need all-world receivers to run a dominant offense. . Hmm Peyton Manning had Harrison/ Wayne Montana had Rice Steve Young had Rice Marino had Duper and Clayton Warner had Bruce and Holt Aikman had Irvin Bradshaw had Swann and Stalworth Just for starters , would you like me to continue Gee, you think playing with HOF QBs might have aided in the development of some of those guys? Go look at Harrison and Wayne's career trajectory. Harrison's receiving yards went from 776 to 1,663 in Peyton's second year. It took Wayne four seasons with Peyton to break 1,000 yards. And now look what Peyton's doing for Decker and Thomas in Denver. Please go see what Tom Brady has done for an entire career without a legitimate #1 receiver (besides Moss for one season). Please check out how the 2005 Seahawks had the most dominant offense in the NFL with a receiving corp worse than what we have now. Please take notice that Victor Cruz and Wes Welker were undrafted free agents who developed chemistry with great QBs. And finally, you might have already recognized that Russell Wilson has helped Golden Tate go from consensus bust to valuable contributor in a single season. No one is denying we need to add more depth at WR. We just don't need to compromise significant cap space or talent to do it. Obsessing over finding "stud receivers" is quick way to bury your franchise. Go ask Detroit or Oakland how that worked out for them.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:53 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10041
|
|
You would catch VD with Eli. If you were on the Giants, I give you 6 yards, 1 catch, and an extra point for the year.
True, Eli is a gambler and creates opportunities, but Nicks is good, and Cruz is a better UDFA than Baldwin by far.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kbreitkreutz
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:57 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 20
|
|
Lol, don't really have much to add just, lol
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:57 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3090
|
|
Also, regarding the perception that our receivers can't get "separation": a lot of this has to do with how careful Russell is with the ball, which is a great thing at this stage in his development. He doesn't make a lot of risky throws. As he continues to build chemistry with his receivers and as his own skills continue to develop, he'll become more confident in making the tighter throws, and the whole "separation" thing will become less of an issue.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:00 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
|
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9923
|
|
I thought a dropkick is worth 2?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kbreitkreutz
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:02 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 20
|
pehawk wrote: I thought a dropkick is worth 2? Yessir
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:04 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
|
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 9923
|
kbreitkreutz wrote: pehawk wrote: I thought a dropkick is worth 2? Yessir Scotte's SO DUMB.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SNDavidson
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm
Posts: 1429
|
|
Tony Ventrella and Clare Farnsworth for a six pack and some scratch tickets?
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lukerguy
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:38 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 1363
|
DavidSeven wrote: warden wrote: DavidSeven wrote: but truly elite QBs don't need all-world receivers to run a dominant offense. . Hmm Peyton Manning had Harrison/ Wayne Montana had Rice Steve Young had Rice Marino had Duper and Clayton Warner had Bruce and Holt Aikman had Irvin Bradshaw had Swann and Stalworth Just for starters , would you like me to continue Gee, you think playing with HOF QBs might have aided in the development of some of those guys? Go look at Harrison and Wayne's career trajectory. Harrison's receiving yards went from 776 to 1,663 in Peyton's second year. It took Wayne four seasons with Peyton to break 1,000 yards. And now look what Peyton's doing for Decker and Thomas in Denver. Please go see what Tom Brady has done for an entire career without a legitimate #1 receiver (besides Moss for one season). Please check out how the 2005 Seahawks had the most dominant offense in the NFL with a receiving corp worse than what we have now. Please take notice that Victor Cruz and Wes Welker were undrafted free agents who developed chemistry with great QBs. And finally, you might have already recognized that Russell Wilson has helped Golden Tate go from consensus bust to valuable contributor in a single season. No one is denying we need to add more depth at WR. We just don't need to compromise significant cap space or talent to do it. Obsessing over finding "stud receivers" is quick way to bury your franchise. Go ask Detroit or Oakland how that worked out for them. Wayne had 1355 yards this year without Manning.. Also, the year Brady had Moss it was by far his best statistical year. No doubt that the HOF QB is good on his own, but to say that the QB makes them is a stretch. The only conclusion I can come to would be that it would definitely help a lot to have a pro bowl caliber WR on our team _________________  "We all we got, we all we need"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:47 pm |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 17315
Location: Graham, WA
|
|
no body is on this Calais Campbell train with me huh?
_________________  3elieve
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3090
|
lukerguy wrote:
Wayne had 1355 yards this year without Manning..
Also, the year Brady had Moss it was by far his best statistical year.
No doubt that the HOF QB is good on his own, but to say that the QB makes them is a stretch. The only conclusion I can come to would be that it would definitely help a lot to have a pro bowl caliber WR on our team
Wayne is the only decent skill player on that team, and Luck was chucking it this season. Of course he was going to get yards. The main point was that Manning helped develop Wayne into a good WR. He didn't walk into the league with pro-bowl skills. And look, of course the offense gets a boost with super talented receivers. That generally happens when you put better players at any position. All I said was that an elite QB doesn't need all-world receivers to run a dominant offense, which has been proven time and time again. If the next Calvin Johnson falls in our lap, then great! But we don't need to spend tons of money or overreach in the draft to address this need. All I'm saying.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:08 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 2261
|
DavidSeven wrote: Gee, you think playing with HOF QBs might have aided in the development of some of those guys? Go look at Harrison and Wayne's career trajectory. Harrison's receiving yards went from 776 to 1,663 in Peyton's second year. It took Wayne four seasons with Peyton to break 1,000 yards. And now look what Peyton's doing for Decker and Thomas in Denver.
Yeah and Harrison's yards actually went DOWN Peyton's rookie year (despite him breaking the record for rookie passing yards), despite the fact that a year previously he had John "led two teams in three years to the number 1 overall pick" Harbaugh throwing him the ball. Quote: No one is denying we need to add more depth at WR. We just don't need to compromise significant cap space or talent to do it. Obsessing over finding "stud receivers" is quick way to bury your franchise. Go ask Detroit or Oakland how that worked out for them. Terrible examples, Oakland didn't have a quarterback (as did Detroit for many years), and Detroit were doing pretty well with Johnson until they lost their running game completely
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zowert
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:06 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 1990
Location: Seattle
|
|
No way Matt Flynn is worth Larry Fitzgerald.
The Cardinals already traded for a QB similar to Flynn, with the same amount of experience in the NFL. His name was Kevin Kolb. That didn't work out too well for them. Kolb has a stronger arm than Flynn too.
I wonder if Steve Raible can still catch? Lets have him come out of retirement and sign him if we can't find a franchise receiver.
_________________
~ The Stache'
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zowert
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:12 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm
Posts: 1990
Location: Seattle
|
|
We are paying Sydney Rice $8.5 million next season, while his cap# is $9 million..
Larry Fitgerald's salary for next season is listed at $5.25 million, but his cap# is $20 million..
How does that work?
_________________
~ The Stache'
|
|
| |
|
|
|
garydrake425
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 902
Location: Everett, Wa
|
Sounds good but do u honestly think that would ever be considered from AZ point of veiw?  Probably not. But there is a chance there's a trade made for Flynn at some point. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:33 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
|
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 4289
|
Throwdown wrote: no body is on this Calais Campbell train with me huh? He's a monster too. The Cards have a lot of talent on D. Hope they don't find a QB any time soon
_________________
February 2, 2014... the day the dream was finally realized
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HUGGY
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:30 pm |
|
| *NET Poop Holster* |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:07 pm
Posts: 310
Location: N. Seattle
|
|
Larry is 29. His 128 million dollar contract takes him to 37. The way he looked this season I don't see him physically making it to the end of his agreement.
Our problem is not in recieving. It is in the O-Line not being able to open holes for our running backs against certain teams personell in the first half of a game. The Rams..Wash...The Falcons.. were all trouble for our O-Line in the first half of those games. The read option stagnates if our opponent doesn't respect the run.
It would be nice if we didn't have to put the team on the back of Wilson to come from behind in crucial second halves.
Whatever the problem is with our O-Line ..Fix it. Everything else will fall into place.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:38 pm |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 14120
Location: Portland, OR
|
|
I say we trade Flynn for Kevin Kolb.
_________________
Super Bowl Champions XVLIII
|
|
| |
|
|
|
garydrake425
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:39 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am
Posts: 902
Location: Everett, Wa
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seeker
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:30 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 7:21 pm
Posts: 1343
|
|
Flynn for Vincent wilfork
_________________
We are the 2014 Superbowl champions and it can never, ever be taken away.
Greatest defense in NFL history.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Bigpumpkin
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 4:41 pm |
|
| *GOLD SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 4627
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
|
|
Trades in the NFL are a relatively rare thing. Odds are good that we get our talent through the Draft.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TeamoftheCentury
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:55 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:54 am
Posts: 710
Location: Orlando, FL
|
xCalibur wrote: therealjohncarlson wrote: Better chance of my ass spontaneously combusting tomorrow afternoon lol...i second that. Careful, you must have forgotten what happened last time a bunch of wise-guys made such a proclamation. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPruGs4IyK4_________________ World Champion Seattle Seahawks
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Winterfell
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 10:00 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 3:55 pm
Posts: 128
Location: The Wall
|
|
I'd prefer if we went after Mike Wallace or Dwayne Bowe. Not only are both guys younger, but I think they'll come cheaper. Bowe for his recent injury issue, and Wallace for his recent reputation hit for holding out and then having a sub-par year for an under-achieving Steelers team.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 11:52 pm |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 11083
Location: PoCompton, BC Canada
|
kearly wrote: Honestly, if Fitzgerald was on the waiver wire I would not take him. Go to Spotrac and look at his cap hits for the next six or seven years. If we traded Flynn for Fitz, you might as well throw in Sherman and Earl, because we wouldn't have the money to extend them with that kind of contract on the books.
He also declined this year after putting up 1400 yards with the same QBs in 2011. Who's to say that decline isn't real?
AZ could end up releasing Fitz in a couple years. When that happens, I'd give him a reasonable contract. Until then, he's not worth it. Holy crap i just did that. Did i read that right?! Is be really going to account for a $20M cap hit in 2015!? That's nutso. That's the stupidest contract I've ever seen! No wonder Arizona sucks...
_________________
I <3 Nunchucks
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sam1313
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:02 am |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 1:56 pm
Posts: 1744
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
|
tacomahawk wrote: While I would love to have someone of Fitz's caliber, I do not want to make my enemy stronger. I also do not want to put Flynn in the same division with a possible chip on his shoulder that we would see twice a year. This^ And, whoever said trade Flynn for Wilfork, I would be down for that.
_________________
"I want to drink Ranier Beer out of a mug made from Jim harbaugh's hollowed out skull." CANHAWK
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ceej22
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:22 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 9:36 pm
Posts: 206
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: A World Peace, AbsolutNET, Alexander, Anglo-Hawk, Anguish, Animalman, Aros, Atradees, BeaHUman, DynoHawk, formido, GoldenTater81, Goodwin Seahawk, Google [Bot], grizbob, HawkDfence, HawkinNY, Lieutenant Dan, lucky49, Majestic-12 [Bot], MizzouHawks, OrFan, Perfundle, RockHawk, Scottemojo, seahawksny, Seahwkgal, SoulfishHawk, stevelargent, StoneCold, TDBinOLY, the ditch, themunn, TwilightError, Yahoo [Bot] and 172 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
