 |
| Author |
Message |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:48 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6665
|
|
No I am not. I'd catch 800 and 7 TD's with Eli.
Classic Deon Branch syndrome, except neither of those two were ever talented enough to be drafted in round 1.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:49 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am Posts: 654
|
warden wrote: DavidSeven wrote: but truly elite QBs don't need all-world receivers to run a dominant offense. . Hmm Peyton Manning had Harrison/ Wayne Montana had Rice Steve Young had Rice Marino had Duper and Clayton Warner had Bruce and Holt Aikman had Irvin Bradshaw had Swann and Stalworth Just for starters , would you like me to continue Gee, you think playing with HOF QBs might have aided in the development of some of those guys? Go look at Harrison and Wayne's career trajectory. Harrison's receiving yards went from 776 to 1,663 in Peyton's second year. It took Wayne four seasons with Peyton to break 1,000 yards. And now look what Peyton's doing for Decker and Thomas in Denver. Please go see what Tom Brady has done for an entire career without a legitimate #1 receiver (besides Moss for one season). Please check out how the 2005 Seahawks had the most dominant offense in the NFL with a receiving corp worse than what we have now. Please take notice that Victor Cruz and Wes Welker were undrafted free agents who developed chemistry with great QBs. And finally, you might have already recognized that Russell Wilson has helped Golden Tate go from consensus bust to valuable contributor in a single season. No one is denying we need to add more depth at WR. We just don't need to compromise significant cap space or talent to do it. Obsessing over finding "stud receivers" is quick way to bury your franchise. Go ask Detroit or Oakland how that worked out for them.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:53 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am Posts: 7343
|
|
You would catch VD with Eli. If you were on the Giants, I give you 6 yards, 1 catch, and an extra point for the year.
True, Eli is a gambler and creates opportunities, but Nicks is good, and Cruz is a better UDFA than Baldwin by far.
_________________ SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kbreitkreutz
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:57 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 pm Posts: 20
|
|
Lol, don't really have much to add just, lol
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:57 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am Posts: 654
|
|
Also, regarding the perception that our receivers can't get "separation": a lot of this has to do with how careful Russell is with the ball, which is a great thing at this stage in his development. He doesn't make a lot of risky throws. As he continues to build chemistry with his receivers and as his own skills continue to develop, he'll become more confident in making the tighter throws, and the whole "separation" thing will become less of an issue.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:00 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6665
|
|
I thought a dropkick is worth 2?
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kbreitkreutz
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:02 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:08 pm Posts: 20
|
pehawk wrote: I thought a dropkick is worth 2? Yessir
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:04 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6665
|
kbreitkreutz wrote: pehawk wrote: I thought a dropkick is worth 2? Yessir Scotte's SO DUMB.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SNDavidson
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm Posts: 1196
|
|
Tony Ventrella and Clare Farnsworth for a six pack and some scratch tickets?
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
lukerguy
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:38 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm Posts: 887
|
DavidSeven wrote: warden wrote: DavidSeven wrote: but truly elite QBs don't need all-world receivers to run a dominant offense. . Hmm Peyton Manning had Harrison/ Wayne Montana had Rice Steve Young had Rice Marino had Duper and Clayton Warner had Bruce and Holt Aikman had Irvin Bradshaw had Swann and Stalworth Just for starters , would you like me to continue Gee, you think playing with HOF QBs might have aided in the development of some of those guys? Go look at Harrison and Wayne's career trajectory. Harrison's receiving yards went from 776 to 1,663 in Peyton's second year. It took Wayne four seasons with Peyton to break 1,000 yards. And now look what Peyton's doing for Decker and Thomas in Denver. Please go see what Tom Brady has done for an entire career without a legitimate #1 receiver (besides Moss for one season). Please check out how the 2005 Seahawks had the most dominant offense in the NFL with a receiving corp worse than what we have now. Please take notice that Victor Cruz and Wes Welker were undrafted free agents who developed chemistry with great QBs. And finally, you might have already recognized that Russell Wilson has helped Golden Tate go from consensus bust to valuable contributor in a single season. No one is denying we need to add more depth at WR. We just don't need to compromise significant cap space or talent to do it. Obsessing over finding "stud receivers" is quick way to bury your franchise. Go ask Detroit or Oakland how that worked out for them. Wayne had 1355 yards this year without Manning.. Also, the year Brady had Moss it was by far his best statistical year. No doubt that the HOF QB is good on his own, but to say that the QB makes them is a stretch. The only conclusion I can come to would be that it would definitely help a lot to have a pro bowl caliber WR on our team
_________________  "We all we got, we all we need"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:47 pm |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 11338 Location: Graham, WA
|
|
no body is on this Calais Campbell train with me huh?
_________________ Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 10:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am Posts: 654
|
lukerguy wrote: Wayne had 1355 yards this year without Manning.. Also, the year Brady had Moss it was by far his best statistical year.
No doubt that the HOF QB is good on his own, but to say that the QB makes them is a stretch. The only conclusion I can come to would be that it would definitely help a lot to have a pro bowl caliber WR on our team
Wayne is the only decent skill player on that team, and Luck was chucking it this season. Of course he was going to get yards. The main point was that Manning helped develop Wayne into a good WR. He didn't walk into the league with pro-bowl skills. And look, of course the offense gets a boost with super talented receivers. That generally happens when you put better players at any position. All I said was that an elite QB doesn't need all-world receivers to run a dominant offense, which has been proven time and time again. If the next Calvin Johnson falls in our lap, then great! But we don't need to spend tons of money or overreach in the draft to address this need. All I'm saying.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
themunn
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:08 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri May 18, 2012 4:38 pm Posts: 1115
|
DavidSeven wrote: Gee, you think playing with HOF QBs might have aided in the development of some of those guys? Go look at Harrison and Wayne's career trajectory. Harrison's receiving yards went from 776 to 1,663 in Peyton's second year. It took Wayne four seasons with Peyton to break 1,000 yards. And now look what Peyton's doing for Decker and Thomas in Denver.
Yeah and Harrison's yards actually went DOWN Peyton's rookie year (despite him breaking the record for rookie passing yards), despite the fact that a year previously he had John "led two teams in three years to the number 1 overall pick" Harbaugh throwing him the ball. Quote: No one is denying we need to add more depth at WR. We just don't need to compromise significant cap space or talent to do it. Obsessing over finding "stud receivers" is quick way to bury your franchise. Go ask Detroit or Oakland how that worked out for them. Terrible examples, Oakland didn't have a quarterback (as did Detroit for many years), and Detroit were doing pretty well with Johnson until they lost their running game completely
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zowert
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:06 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm Posts: 1718 Location: Seattle
|
|
No way Matt Flynn is worth Larry Fitzgerald.
The Cardinals already traded for a QB similar to Flynn, with the same amount of experience in the NFL. His name was Kevin Kolb. That didn't work out too well for them. Kolb has a stronger arm than Flynn too.
I wonder if Steve Raible can still catch? Lets have him come out of retirement and sign him if we can't find a franchise receiver.
_________________ ~ The Stache'
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zowert
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:12 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm Posts: 1718 Location: Seattle
|
|
We are paying Sydney Rice $8.5 million next season, while his cap# is $9 million..
Larry Fitgerald's salary for next season is listed at $5.25 million, but his cap# is $20 million..
How does that work?
_________________ ~ The Stache'
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
garydrake425
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am Posts: 897 Location: Everett, Wa
|
Sounds good but do u honestly think that would ever be considered from AZ point of veiw?  Probably not. But there is a chance there's a trade made for Flynn at some point. 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:33 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm Posts: 2670
|
Throwdown wrote: no body is on this Calais Campbell train with me huh? He's a monster too. The Cards have a lot of talent on D. Hope they don't find a QB any time soon
_________________ Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HUGGY
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:30 pm |
|
| *NET Poop Holster* |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:07 pm Posts: 310 Location: N. Seattle
|
|
Larry is 29. His 128 million dollar contract takes him to 37. The way he looked this season I don't see him physically making it to the end of his agreement.
Our problem is not in recieving. It is in the O-Line not being able to open holes for our running backs against certain teams personell in the first half of a game. The Rams..Wash...The Falcons.. were all trouble for our O-Line in the first half of those games. The read option stagnates if our opponent doesn't respect the run.
It would be nice if we didn't have to put the team on the back of Wilson to come from behind in crucial second halves.
Whatever the problem is with our O-Line ..Fix it. Everything else will fall into place.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:38 pm |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 10347 Location: Portland, OR
|
|
I say we trade Flynn for Kevin Kolb.
_________________ My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
garydrake425
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 1:39 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:28 am Posts: 897 Location: Everett, Wa
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: AbsolutNET, AKSeahawker, Benzhawk, BGHawk, BoatsAndHose, Bobblehead, Brahn, brodad, cacksman, Cartire, ctown12, dbmack, decaff907, dumbrabbit, FlyingGreg, formido, Google [Bot], HAWK-N-ROLL, Hawkfan77, Hawknballs, HAWKS2theBONE, jonesy7748, Leep, marymoorhawk, mistaowen, Natethegreat, nIdahoSeahawk, nsport, Pstark3, razgriz737, Recon_Hawk, RockHawk, SeahawkFrost, silverjoel, SoulfishHawk, Spleenhawk2.0, thaima1shu, the_12th_man, THUGCAPS, TorontoHawk, vin.couve12, Zukistubbs and 155 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|