Sure, somewhat obvious positional needs indeed. The QBs this draft are not well regarded league wise, there may only be one top CB this draft with others being able to fairly taken later. There seems to be only two OTs worth taking at pick 9 and both are likely to be taken very early. This leaves the deepest position of the draft, edge rushers, and it'd be a mistake to be forced to not pick one of them who could be a huge difference maker going forward.
However, to have to draft a T or a questionable QB instead of a top pass rusher when the opportunity might not be there for the next draft might be yet again a poor choice for the team to make when solidifying a position prior to the draft might remove the raw factor of absolute predictability and need. In the end I suppose we'll find this out in due course, meanwhile nothing much seems to be happening. If you look at the roster page the most obvious positional needs at present are DE and OT.
Maybe you should read the Seahawksdraftblog.com and listen to the draftniks assessments of the OTs and DEs.