Search results

  1. kidhawk

    2024 SEAHAWKS Depth Chart and Roster Moves

    If he asked for his release that would probably negate any guarantees especially this early in the deal. I suspect we are just cutting bait here.
  2. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    I would have been when I first came here. Maybe that’s the point?
  3. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    Which actually reminds me that the gameday forum is another reason that a new member might want to create a thread as threads is what that particular forum is all about.
  4. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    When people are telling you that you are skewing things to get the result you desire this is exactly what they mean. You aren’t obtuse but you think that one choice having way more votes than any other doesn’t mean what it means and people call it out. You don’t really care what people say or...
  5. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    Consider this a ballot. You have 8 people running for office. One gets the most votes by a wide margin but the others all ran on similar platforms and decide they want to just bunch their votes together and put their favorite through. That’s what is happening here.
  6. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    So you guys aren’t changing the policy? Otherwise it kind of is about going your way
  7. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    I don’t need a screenshot. The reasons for the mistake don’t really change that fact that it is a mistake. There’s not a single good reason to do something that is to the detriment of the long term health of the board. Shortsightedness doesn’t ever solve anything properly.
  8. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    The statement isn’t inaccurate. You put up multiple choices. The choice wining by a landslide is to not to do anything. You are combining replies that fit what you want for an outcome. For 40 percent of people unaffected n the outcome to vote that way is huge. You are just blinded by what you...
  9. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    I am passionate about this because it’s bad for the future of this forum. The problem I’m seeing here is that nobody actually seems to care about that as this rule doesn’t change things for any of us. There will come a time as the forum continues to decline that people will understand and it...
  10. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    You believe that 60% of people who won’t be personally affected by the change is some kind of coupe? The fact that 40% of current posters who have no skin in the game are telling you it’s a bad idea should be a red flag. Instead you are looking for any reason to apply a rule that will not...
  11. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    Most spammers should be stopped at the door during approving new members. This is why it has never been a serious issue. You can say it’s multiple issues but that isn’t being honest. I’ve done more than my share of moderating here and I know what I’m talking about here. Spammers aren’t an issue...
  12. kidhawk

    Jake Bates, K, UFL

    I’m not a fan of paying Myers all that dead money on the cap then bringing in someone else who may or may not be an improvement. Let’s let his contract play out and start looking to replace him in the future. We aren’t exactly a field goal away from the Super Bowl.
  13. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    For those that worry about spammers can you tell me how many you’ve actually seen in the past year? I don’t believe spammers and bots are the problem. I think it’s safe to say that the issue being dealt with is previous posters with bad intentions. The bits about spammers and bots is just a...
  14. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    Unless they’ve changed things there was a system in place here where all new members had to be approved before they could actually finalize membership. There were features in place that when monitored correctly weeded out the vast majority of bots and such. If this is still in place then we...
  15. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    No, it’s not only going to affect new members who want to troll or spam or dox, it’s going to keep some amazing future members from ever posting their first post. I know you’ll argue that they can post but there are people out there who can be excellent members here who won’t be comfortable...
  16. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    this forum/site is over 25 years old without ever having this policy in place. It’s successful where others are not. This isn’t the change that makes us better it just makes us similar.
  17. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    I respectfully disagree completely with your assessment here. What you seem to have planned will probably make moderating simpler but it won’t make for a better community. I have an idea of why this is being done but if you follow through with this then the community loses and they win
  18. kidhawk

    ATTENTION ALL ……

    You guys are way overthinking things and it kinda smells like mods just don’t want to deal with new posters. What is needed is for someone to take it upon themselves to greet new posters when they sign up and before they post with a little welcome to the forum DM like Les used to do. This would...
  19. kidhawk

    The Auburn of Boom

    It’s nothing personal to Auburn but there was one Legion of Boom here and as you say the Auburn phrase just doesn’t sound right. I’d kind of like to see if either even play before announcing nicknames. Either way I thin Boom is off the table
  20. kidhawk

    The Auburn of Boom

    I’ll hold off on assessing them until practices and preseason where we get a better idea of where they fit in our system but I just had to say that If I never hear the phrase “auburn of boom” again it’ll be too soon.

Latest posts

Top