RCATES":i8eux8c7 said:1. Russ is too inconsistent to be considered Elite.
2. This team will never be a real contender with PC at the helm.
Flyingsquad23":1jn7wv8l said:RCATES":1jn7wv8l said:1. Russ is too inconsistent to be considered Elite.
2. This team will never be a real contender with PC at the helm.
Both of these claims are bogus.
Flyingsquad23":14pcnvyf said:RCATES":14pcnvyf said:1. Russ is too inconsistent to be considered Elite.
2. This team will never be a real contender with PC at the helm.
Both of these claims are bogus.
BubbaGump":l2lx4inl said:I agree with the original poster. What category has Russell improved in the last 3 years? I don’t see anything different and he has a vastly improved supporting cast and does not seem elite. I have been a huge Russ fan since his arrival but have come to the conclusion that he has hit his ceiling. I’m not saying he is trash but he is not elite. As for Pete, what can you say. His non ability to adjust his style of gameplay is his down fall IMHO.
AgentDib":1rg603bk said:The term "contender" makes little sense statistically. Where do you draw the line?
1% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Patriots/Vikings/Cardinals/49ers
2% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Dolphins/Raiders
3% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Colts/Browns
4% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Ravens/Bucs
6% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Seahawks/Titans/Bills/Rams
12% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Packers/Steelers
15% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Chiefs/Saints
All of these teams still have a chance this season, and we've seen plenty of champions over the years who had a relatively low percentage at this time of the year.
I suspect what fans usually mean when they say their team isn't a contender is "I was hoping we would be at a higher percentage right now, but because we are a lower percentage I don't want to get my hopes up. Therefore I am going to pretend it's 0% in order to save myself disappointment down the road."
RCATES":gnnejq8m said:1. Russ is too inconsistent to be considered Elite.
2. This team will never be a real contender with PC at the helm.
Seymour":3r4kh0gi said:RCATES":3r4kh0gi said:1. Russ is too inconsistent to be considered Elite.
2. This team will never be a real contender with PC at the helm.
Took quite a while for the Russ haters to show their face with some weapons to support their claim...that is the good news. Since when does elite mean you can have no bad games? :roll: Pete called out Russ on the turnovers and now Russ is frozen in place with no oven left to cook on. Funny thing is, many were calling Rogers washed up just last year and now here he is again proving the haters wrong. Same thing will happen with Russ.
RCATES":239kaojk said:1. Russ is too inconsistent to be considered Elite.
2. This team will never be a real contender with PC at the helm.
AgentDib":3ny5snol said:The term "contender" makes little sense statistically. Where do you draw the line?
1% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Patriots/Vikings/Cardinals/49ers
2% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Dolphins/Raiders
3% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Colts/Browns
4% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Ravens/Bucs
6% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Seahawks/Titans/Bills/Rams
12% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Packers/Steelers
15% likely to win the Super Bowl? - Chiefs/Saints
All of these teams still have a chance this season, and we've seen plenty of champions over the years who had a relatively low percentage at this time of the year.
I suspect what fans usually mean when they say their team isn't a contender is "I was hoping we would be at a higher percentage right now, but because we are a lower percentage I don't want to get my hopes up. Therefore I am going to pretend it's 0% in order to save myself disappointment down the road."
RCATES":1eyirwbn said:1. Russ is too inconsistent to be considered Elite.
2. This team will never be a real contender with PC at the helm.