mikeak
Well-known member
stang233":2qj6fwo0 said:The fact that the hawks opted to release him and pay him rather then let him retire and pay the franchise back means if he wants to play again it will be in a hawks uni.
Option 3 was him not retiring (which he wouldn't have done) staying on the roster and being paid his full salary (which Seahawks wouldn't have done)
There was never an option to not cutting him. We weren't nice or mean. We simply did the only thing the situation could result in
Why do people think an injured player would retire over not playing due to injury?