This is a great point that the extremely pro Geno crowd misses in my opinion. He’s 34 and learning a whole new system. The o it way that makes sense is if they draft their QB of the future and he’s learning it too as the backup. To put this off a year just doesn’t make sense. Kind of wondering if this turns out to be an Alex Smith type situation. KC got killed for it by their fans too because Smith was a borderline top 10 QB at the time. Interesting.
I don't see why people think it's a disqualifying circumstance that we've got a new staff and new incoming offensive system. Anyone is going to be starting from scratch, including a rookie and even Penix as the system has to change anyway. The hashes are constricted and the league is obviously different than the CFB ranks.
A new staff coming in, especially one that presumably wants to hit the ground running and compete out of the gate, isn't obligated to blow everything up and start over. Grubb's history seems pretty synergistic overall with Geno's playstyle and we're not sitting atop the draft order, so why are people getting bent out of shape? Let the dudes retain who they want to retain. They've obviously got an idea of what they want the team to look like by the time September rolls around.
There is going to be a learning curve for any player on the roster, and there's going to be a learning curve for any player they acquire or draft. Additionally, I think some here are a bit too quick to dismiss the other learning curve present for rookies... like, the one where they have to learn how to be a professional NFL player. Anyone here making definitive statements about what time is best to move on from the incumbent quarterback, especially before the draft even rolls around, is being at least a bit obtuse.
It makes sense if they end up drafting a legitimate QBOTF candidate, and it makes sense if they end up not securing a QBOTF candidate because they didn't have one available that they actually wanted. It makes sense regardless.