Rainger
Well-known member
Shot goes over 4 lines before getting picked up by the Dallas player. If you have ever watched hockey you know this is called icing 99% of the time. Throwing your hand up at a shot going over 4 lines does not negate icing. It still went over 3 lines after that.
It bounces off the end boards the 4th line, back to the Dallas player. The attempt to bat it by the Kraken player was back at the first blue line it still went over 3 more lines untouched.
Chapow please give me definitive evidence citing the rules of Hockey how this was NOT icing??? As defined and called all the time in the game.
Listen to the announcer say NO ICING? You can go to every definition of the rule on the internet and not find a reason that this should not have been called icing. It went over 4 lines, was not ignored or not played at by the Kraken player and no Kraken player could have gotten to the puck first!
A judgement call by the officials that benefited the Stars. A fact!
It bounces off the end boards the 4th line, back to the Dallas player. The attempt to bat it by the Kraken player was back at the first blue line it still went over 3 more lines untouched.
Chapow please give me definitive evidence citing the rules of Hockey how this was NOT icing??? As defined and called all the time in the game.
Listen to the announcer say NO ICING? You can go to every definition of the rule on the internet and not find a reason that this should not have been called icing. It went over 4 lines, was not ignored or not played at by the Kraken player and no Kraken player could have gotten to the puck first!
A judgement call by the officials that benefited the Stars. A fact!
Last edited: