hawknation2017
New member
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2017
- Messages
- 1,812
- Reaction score
- 0
Bigpumpkin":1jzesyxo said:If the OL shows up this Sunday, then I agree that Mike should run ....but not as often as the Army running backs!
hawknation2017":1qr6uiey said:
Seymour":25jy38gq said:Ya, lets keep pounding it into our current biggest team weakness (run blocking). Lets see, at 3.3 YPC that would net us on average exactly 0 first downs if we run the ball every down (unless you want to run on 4th down).
That is a certain formula to stall the offense and lose more (given our current oline), so if that is the goal, by all means lets run more.
hawknation2017":3pm195vo said:
Sox-n-Hawks":32fehmpj said:hawknation2017":32fehmpj said:In addition to the outside zone run, the guy has good hands and is very nifty and hard to tackle in space.
Bevell would be wise to try a pitch play to Davis. That's a wrinkle of creativity that we haven't seen from this offense in forever.
I think a back like Davis would wreck house in a hard hitting power offense. Some hard hitting 3/4 gap plays with pulling linemen. Hard hitting smash mouth football, then quick play-action passes. Keep the Seahawks defense off of the field, long sustained drives and wear them down.
nanomoz":28s4kacy said:He honestly reminds me of Edgerrin sometimes. I concur with those that say he'd be better in a simpler, man-on-man blocking scheme.
Well executed, the zone scheme is supposed to result in more chunk plays. It hasn't seemed to since . . . 2014 or so on this team.