Pick 35: Nick Emmanwori

Lagartixa

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
2,152
Reaction score
3,736
Location
Taboão da Serra, SP, Brazil
They won the trade value based on the draft chart genius

I'm not sure who or what the "draft chart genius" is, but it's irrelevant. Whether you use charts like the updated JJ chart (roughly how teams value picks) or the updated Chase Stuart chart (roughly what picks are actually worth in expected talent), the fact remains that the Seahawks paid first-round capital for a player who was, by consensus of all 32 NFL teams, not worth a first-round pick.
That's far from the bargain @Hawkpower suggested by ridiculing @MontanaHawk05 for supposedly not liking first-round value in the second round, and I was responding to that. What @Hawkpower ignored was that the Seahawks gave up first-round capital for Emmanwori, and that the 32 NFL teams had decided Emmanwori wasn't a first-round player.
As I said, the truth looks like a second-round-level player taken with first-round draft capital. As I said, that's not the end of the world. However, it is pretty much the opposite of what @Hawkpower had suggested it was, and that's why I replied. Instead of first-round talent for second-round capital, as @Hawkpower had suggested the result of the trade and pick was, it was actually second-round talent (by consensus of all 32 NFL teams) for first-round capital.
 

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
3,184
Reaction score
1,341
I'm not sure who or what the "draft chart genius" is, but it's irrelevant. Whether you use charts like the updated JJ chart (roughly how teams value picks) or the updated Chase Stuart (roughly what picks are actually worth in expected talent), the fact remains that the Seahawks paid first-round capital for a player who was, by consensus of all 32 NFL teams, not worth a first-round pick.
That's far from the bargain @Hawkpower suggested by ridiculing @MontanaHawk05 for supposedly not liking first-round value in the second round, and I was responding to that. What @Hawkpower ignored was that the Seahawks gave up first-round capital for Emmanwori, and that the 32 NFL teams had decided Emmanwori wasn't a first-round player.
As I said, the truth looks like a second-round-level player taken with first-round draft capital. As I said, that's not the end of the world. However, it is pretty much the opposite of what @Hawkpower had suggested it was, and that's why I replied. Instead of first-round talent for second-round capital, as @Hawkpower had suggested the result of the trade and pick was, it was actually second-round talent (by consensus of all 32 NFL teams) for first-round capital.
That is a real strong arguement except for the fact that they didn't give up the value of a first round pick to select Emmanwori. Also just because the teams in the first round didn't select him doesn't mean they didn't rate him as a first round talent.
They have needs just like the Seahawks do. Our first prioroty was to select a guard but I read Nick would have been their second choice at 18. Very possible other teams had bigger needs than a safety and addressed those needs rather than selecting a safety.

Nick Emmanwori was projected consistently as a top 20 to top of the second round player. What we gave for the 35th pick was good value despite your protests otherwise.

On thing is for sure whether JS trades up or trades down someone on dot net is going to be throwing a snit about it. When JS has traded up it has generally turned out great by the way.
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
6,275
Reaction score
2,390
Nick Emmanwori was projected consistently as a top 20 to top of the second round player. What we gave for the 35th pick was good value despite your protests otherwise.
Fwiw, Dane Brugler of The Athletic... in his annual The Beast draft guide... had Emmanwori as #17 overall in his Top 100.
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,794
Reaction score
1,255
Location
Phoenix az
I still think he will work out as an effective NFL player, and hope he does, but let's not ignore the facts to pretend this is a bargain like "first-round talent at second-round prices," because both parts of that are incorrect.
All 32 NFL teams showed us clearly that they had determined that Emmanwori did not have first-round value by, y'know, not picking him in the first round. And the Seahawks gave up more than just a second-round pick to get Emmanwori, so "at second-round prices" isn't the case here either.

This looks like a second-round player taken with first-round draft capital. Not the end of the world, but not the bargain "1st round (sic) value at 35" incorrectly suggests.

Guys don't always drop out of round 1 because they aren't round 1 quality

There can be a run on Tackles, for example, which push a player at a different position.....regarded to be a 20's value to the 30's for example

So yes, what I said in fact could (and often is) correct
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
18,554
Reaction score
1,470
I've scoured the internet and found nothing of the sort

I am sure I am just missing it, but could you be specific as to what the concerns are with his character?
Behind a paywall, unfortunately.


“There’s some inconsistency and possible character issues. More like football immaturity.”

“He’s naturally contrarian to most everything. He’s got top-20 talent but there’s some bells and whistles that come with him. Just be sure you know. He can probably fray some things. You’ve got to have somebody to deal with the personality. They say this guy is so strong-willed, if you get him onto your side he’ll save the world. If he is opposed to your views he’ll burn the world down.”

Combined with a number of random social media comments from SC fans calling him a loose cannon.
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,794
Reaction score
1,255
Location
Phoenix az
Behind a paywall, unfortunately.




Combined with a number of random social media comments from SC fans calling him a loose cannon.

Oh ok. But he hasn't actually done anything. Just worried that someday he might?

I mean I get having that in the back of our minds, but it seems pretty light doesn't it?
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
18,554
Reaction score
1,470
Oh ok. But he hasn't actually done anything. Just worried that someday he might?

I mean I get having that in the back of our minds, but it seems pretty light doesn't it?
I just hate coachability issues, perhaps more than some. You're on track for NFL first-round money and you're gonna be like that? Day 3, bud.

Maybe Mike's the right guy for him. I certainly see the upside if he is: Kam Chancellor impact.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
30,688
Reaction score
7,221
Location
Kent, WA
“There’s some inconsistency and possible character issues. More like football immaturity.”

“He’s naturally contrarian to most everything. He’s got top-20 talent but there’s some bells and whistles that come with him. Just be sure you know. He can probably fray some things. You’ve got to have somebody to deal with the personality. They say this guy is so strong-willed, if you get him onto your side he’ll save the world. If he is opposed to your views he’ll burn the world down.”
Sounds like 3/4 of the Legion of Boom. :)
 

hgwellz12

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
8,927
Reaction score
4,027
Location
In a lofty place tanglin' with Satan over history.
Knowing that Zabel & Emmanwori are Seahawks will help me sleep better at night. 😆
I have been busier than I have been in YEARS and am finally able to take a look at some tape of our picks, and, MY OH MY! 😯😍 This one ESPECIALLY! Dawg jumps off the screen! Absolute BALLER! With him & Spoon in Money Mike's D? WATCH. TF. OUT! 👀😳
 

CallMeADawg

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
3,146
Reaction score
3,079
I'm not sure who or what the "draft chart genius" is, but it's irrelevant. Whether you use charts like the updated JJ chart (roughly how teams value picks) or the updated Chase Stuart chart (roughly what picks are actually worth in expected talent), the fact remains that the Seahawks paid first-round capital for a player who was, by consensus of all 32 NFL teams, not worth a first-round pick.
That's far from the bargain @Hawkpower suggested by ridiculing @MontanaHawk05 for supposedly not liking first-round value in the second round, and I was responding to that. What @Hawkpower ignored was that the Seahawks gave up first-round capital for Emmanwori, and that the 32 NFL teams had decided Emmanwori wasn't a first-round player.
As I said, the truth looks like a second-round-level player taken with first-round draft capital. As I said, that's not the end of the world. However, it is pretty much the opposite of what @Hawkpower had suggested it was, and that's why I replied. Instead of first-round talent for second-round capital, as @Hawkpower had suggested the result of the trade and pick was, it was actually second-round talent (by consensus of all 32 NFL teams) for first-round capital.
I usually agree with your takes but you are way off on this one. Seattle stole this guy.
 
Top