Chukarhawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2011
- Messages
- 5,087
- Reaction score
- 2,770
you could line him on the outside and he'd be amazing.Going to be a fantastic slot receiver.
That was some beautiful JSN insight. Please, do tell me more.After watching the video, I noticed Lucas still has a better anchor than Cross, just like their rookie year. In fact, Cross was flat on the ground twice lol.
*sigh*
For sure. Lucas is slow, but immovable once he gets his hands on guys. Cross is more athletic and less prone to getting beat around the edge, but he gets blown up quite a bit.After watching the video, I noticed Lucas still has a better anchor than Cross, just like their rookie year. In fact, Cross was flat on the ground twice lol.
Would you differentiate for us? I love the game but never played, so when I read WR1 I assume we’re talking most productive. I would appreciate knowing the difference.*sigh*
We need to try to differentiate between the position of WR1 and being the most productive receiver. They aren’t one and the same.
Love it.
Not kidhawk, but WR1 refers to the place on the Wide Receiver depth chart.Would you differentiate for us? I love the game but never played, so when I read WR1 I assume we’re talking most productive. I would appreciate knowing the difference.
The most productive wide receiver is often called the #1 receiver but WR1 is a position. The plays call out assignments by position so WR1 will have specific asks on any given play but so will WR2, WR3, etc.Would you differentiate for us? I love the game but never played, so when I read WR1 I assume we’re talking most productive. I would appreciate knowing the difference.
This is spot on and I’d add that the #1 is typically the X receiver in most offenses. This could be changing as the league has spread things out. DK is the “X”.The most productive wide receiver is often called the #1 receiver but WR1 is a position. The plays call out assignments by position so WR1 will have specific asks on any given play but so will WR2, WR3, etc.