Go rewatch the game if you can. His PFF grade is fiction. Hell, watch the highlights. That alone gives you enough of an idea to know that the PFF grade is a joke.Agree to disagree.
Go rewatch the game if you can. His PFF grade is fiction. Hell, watch the highlights. That alone gives you enough of an idea to know that the PFF grade is a joke.Agree to disagree.
Go rewatch the game if you can. His PFF grade is fiction. Hell, watch the highlights. That alone gives you enough of an idea to know that the PFF grade is a joke.
PFF score doesn't mean he didn't make any good plays it means he made some bad plays.Some all-22 review including on Laumea. His PFF score is horseshit.
![]()
Seahawks All-22 Film Breakdown: The good and bad from Seattle’s rookies vs. New York Jets
A look at how Sataoa Laumea and other Seahawks rookies performed in the comeback win over the Jets.www.fieldgulls.com
His PFF score was 29.3. Under the "very poor" designation. Worse than any game Bradford or Tomlinson have had. 20 points worse than Haynes's score.PFF score doesn't mean he didn't make any good plays it means he made some bad plays.
Except for short yardage...which we will need. Oh mighty football gods...let us see a drastic improvement there this week.Our line has quietly gotten better the past few weeks.
that does not pass the smell testHis PFF score was 29.3. Under the "very poor" designation. Worse than any game Bradford or Tomlinson have had. 20 points worse than Haynes's score.
That doesn't compute. I watched him pretty closely. There were some misses, for sure. And one legit penalty. But he wasn't worse than Bradford. Not by a long shot.
View attachment 68413
It was two penalties and although you and I know one of them was BS, PFF doesn't care, a penalty is a penalty. He had 2 hurries which is not ideal. He also missed some blocking assignments in the run game. Not a great game, but you can see there's reason for hope. Some of the plays he blocked well, he really blocked well.His PFF score was 29.3. Under the "very poor" designation. Worse than any game Bradford or Tomlinson have had. 20 points worse than Haynes's score.
That doesn't compute. I watched him pretty closely. There were some misses, for sure. And one legit penalty. But he wasn't worse than Bradford. Not by a long shot.
View attachment 68413
Or maybe PFF is wildly inaccurate with how they grade players.It was two penalties and although you and I know one of them was BS, PFF doesn't care, a penalty is a penalty. He had 2 hurries which is not ideal. He also missed some blocking assignments in the run game. Not a great game, but you can see there's reason for hope. Some of the plays he blocked well, he really blocked well.
For comparison:
View attachment 68427
This is the best lineman in the league and he scored a 53 in pass blocking in their Texans game. Does that mean he's a below average pass blocker? Of course not.
Agree to disagree.Or maybe PFF is wildly inaccurate with how they grade players.
Go rewatch the game if you can. His PFF grade is fiction. Hell, watch the highlights. That alone gives you enough of an idea to know that the PFF grade is a joke.
You think PFF is accurate?Agree to disagree.
Are you basing this on his highlight plays or watching every snap he played?Or maybe PFF is wildly inaccurate with how they grade players.