No, he wasn't, but good luck convincing anyone on .net of that.If he is worse than Barton then we don't need him because Barton was trash.
It's a nice switch for us to have this as a outlier, head scratcher, pick of free agency, rather than having a free agency full of head scratchers.
No, he wasn't, but good luck convincing anyone on .net of that.
and here we thought you were a crack dealer from seattle...I haven't posted on here for years...I'm dope and I'm from the 206 Seattle. Don't get more simple than that lol
60% of the snaps is still way too much for Barton. I expect the run defense to be much improved now that Barton's gone. He wasn't the only problem though.It's probably a good time to revisit the fact that Barton only played like 60% of snaps after week 4.
We might be in for some bandit sets with three safeties. I would love that.
he was 16 bro. 16
I get it. Just having fun with it.he was 16 bro. 16
What do you think #54 wants ? $$$
LOL! Good line bigskydoc. although for me this one is something of a head scratcher.It's a nice switch for us to have this as a outlier, head scratcher, pick of free agency, rather than having a free agency full of head scratchers.