chris98251
Well-known member
Title should say Pete brings in his son to challenge Bevell as OC.
Hawk-A-Loogie":34gxfkkq said:I don't know anything about Pete's son. But i just don't like the family thing. I hope it doesn't end up like a Mike / Kyle Shanahan type of ending here in seattle. Cus it's one thing to fire someone but it's another thing to fire your son(s).
I don't believe Nate was on the staff at 'SC, just Brennan.DavidSeven":2ou0bgl1 said:One of Pete's sons is already on the staff and has been since the beginning. Wouldn't be surprised if Pete sent his other kid out there to stay plugged into the H.S. and college recruiting world on the opposite corner of the country. Four year "R&D" mission in Miami. Not a bad gig.
They were both on his staff at USC.
Attyla the Hawk":2z79pfbd said:Hawkfan77":2z79pfbd said:Obviously means we are drafting Phillip Dorsett :stirthepot:
I thought that immediately
CodeWarrior":2z79pfbd said:Oh we would all just be over the moon for another 5'10 WR! I can see the reactions now!
Honestly, I think he could be our #1 overall. Much in the same way Richardson was last year.
Sometimes, you have to take the impact players as they are. What I like most about Dorsett, is his ability to get clean separation with footwork and speed. Honestly, I'm thinking that those kinds of receivers are the kinds that Wilson is more comfortable with. Not throwing the ball up and letting a WR fight for it. Wilson has consistently chosen to throw to the open guy. I'm not sure getting a big target who will look like he's covered will result in Wilson throwing it up and letting his guy make a play.
Im not a fan of nepotism either, but I wouldnt be too worried about this one.Hawk-A-Loogie":sb73jux2 said:I don't know anything about Pete's son. But i just don't like the family thing. I hope it doesn't end up like a Mike / Kyle Shanahan type of ending here in seattle. Cus it's one thing to fire someone but it's another thing to fire your son(s).
McGruff":3nfc6xhf said:JTB":3nfc6xhf said:The value of him coming aboard is the knowledge of a couple of prospects in need areas - Dorsett and TE Clive Walford.
Dorsette is intriguing, and fits our current profile, no matter how much we fans clamor for a big WR . . . spped rules in Pete's book.
Walford is a great blocker. Really like what I see there, but he's not a guy who will stretch a defense in any way, shape or form. He's strictly an underneath guy.
McGruff":3p9g4ew2 said:rideaducati":3p9g4ew2 said:Attyla the Hawk":3p9g4ew2 said:Hawkfan77":3p9g4ew2 said:Obviously means we are drafting Phillip Dorsett :stirthepot:
I thought that immediately
CodeWarrior":3p9g4ew2 said:Oh we would all just be over the moon for another 5'10 WR! I can see the reactions now!
Honestly, I think he could be our #1 overall. Much in the same way Richardson was last year.
Sometimes, you have to take the impact players as they are. What I like most about Dorsett, is his ability to get clean separation with footwork and speed. Honestly, I'm thinking that those kinds of receivers are the kinds that Wilson is more comfortable with. Not throwing the ball up and letting a WR fight for it. Wilson has consistently chosen to throw to the open guy. I'm not sure getting a big target who will look like he's covered will result in Wilson throwing it up and letting his guy make a play.
Russell looked quite comfortable throwing the ball up for grabs to Matthews.
As he did often with Rice as well. And he does it with Kearse.
DJrmb":1oa24hff said:I think the 6'5 guy you're thinking about was Stephen Williams for the 2013 preseason. He had a TD in each of the first 3 preseason games that year.
http://www.nfl.com/player/stephenwilliams/497344/gamelogs