MizzouHawkGal
Well-known member
I use both or "The Seahawks" or whatever else is appropriate.
mrt144":2wfx9l9f said:ZagHawk":2wfx9l9f said:So I just got in a conversation with someone the other day because he caught me using the term "we" a lot when talking about the Hawks. His point being, you don't play for the Hawks, it's "they". Perfectly logical if you ask me. But at the same time I feel like we're so in tuned and connected to this team through social media, training camp, setting noise records that helps our/the team in the stadium. That we can't help but say "we" when we talk about the Hawks. After all they are the Seattle Seahawks (for those of us who live in the area and/or are from it). But again, none of us play for the Hawks, I think there may be a few of us who work for the organization, but the rest of us don't. So what do you say when you're talking about the Seahawks, "we" or "they".
I use we, but only because as far as making a distinction with pronouns and antecedents, it's much more clear to use We when referring to the Seahawks, and they referring to any other team besides the Seahawks.
"We gave the Niners a hell of a NFC Championship game. They came close but were undone by our strong secondary and their absent minded play calling."
Laloosh":ptrwzl12 said:Just don't say "our" too much. Loaf will be on the case.
AMereMuse":283jymvp said:This reminds me of an interesting Sport Psychology -Social Identity- theory that was lectured on in an otherwise tedious Sport Marketing class: Basking in Glory or Cutting off Failure. Basically, the concept states if you're team is winning then you bask in the glory of the win and you use the term, "we", a lot more to identify yourself with the team.
Of course, when they are miserable losers, fans disassociate themselves with the team a bit more - a little less trash talk on other teams' discussion forums for example - and you tend to use the word "they" or the team's name itself. Another strand of the theory are the fans who actually love the loser and identify with the team even more when they are 2- 14 (Basking in reflected failure) and usually think band-wagoners are the spawn of Satan or 49ers fans (both of similar characteristics).
Link for more info:
http://www.units.miamioh.edu/psybersite/fans/bc.shtml
AMereMuse":2pr0u6u6 said:This reminds me of an interesting Sport Psychology -Social Identity- theory that was lectured on in an otherwise tedious Sport Marketing class: Basking in Glory or Cutting off Failure. Basically, the concept states if you're team is winning then you bask in the glory of the win and you use the term, "we", a lot more to identify yourself with the team.
Of course, when they are miserable losers, fans disassociate themselves with the team a bit more - a little less trash talk on other teams' discussion forums for example - and you tend to use the word "they" or the team's name itself. Another strand of the theory are the fans who actually love the loser and identify with the team even more when they are 2- 14 (Basking in reflected failure) and usually think band-wagoners are the spawn of Satan or 49ers fans (both of similar characteristics).
Link for more info:
http://www.units.miamioh.edu/psybersite/fans/bc.shtml
There it is. In all seriousness, more of this sentiment in general = more harmonious society. "Live and let live" is getting its ass kicked with all the instant access to anonymous belittlement and bickering.Scottemojo":aiq926tr said:I used to care about this. I still use "they" when talking about football decisions, but I stopped caring how others use it a long time ago. It simply does not matter.