NFLN Start QB1 KMurray will rack up points vs Seattle Defens

ivotuk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
23,107
Reaction score
1,824
Location
North Pole, Alaska
"Kyler Murray is averaging 20+ points per game and will rack them up vs this Seattle Defense!."

" Start Christian Kirk vs Seattle "


We'll see. If Quentin Dunbar plays, this will be a different Defense. I expect Ryan Neal to play well again, and if Snacks Harrison plays, we should be a much better Defense.
 

Somos doces

Active member
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Messages
254
Reaction score
82
Location
Southeast Washington
I'm guessing most QBs who have faced the Hawks this year have racked up some gaudy fantasy football numbers (apologies for my ignorance; I don't play FF). But really, unless players get thousands of points for a win, who gives a rip how many FF stats Murray accrues Sunday night, as long as the Hawks emerge victorious?
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,210
Reaction score
4,026
Should be a fun game for sure. I'm sure Cardinals fans will be happy that their fantasy teams do great when their actual team loses.
 

RCATES

New member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
749
Reaction score
2
ivotuk":rcxzwcys said:
"Kyler Murray is averaging 20+ points per game and will rack them up vs this Seattle Defense!."

" Start Christian Kirk vs Seattle "


We'll see. If Quentin Dunbar plays, this will be a different Defense. I expect Ryan Neal to play well again, and if Snacks Harrison plays, we should be a much better Defense.

Did you miss the first 2 weeks. Dunbar was the worst player on the field.
 

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
8,844
Reaction score
2,733
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
RCATES":4rbnh9r8 said:
ivotuk":4rbnh9r8 said:
"Kyler Murray is averaging 20+ points per game and will rack them up vs this Seattle Defense!."

" Start Christian Kirk vs Seattle "


We'll see. If Quentin Dunbar plays, this will be a different Defense. I expect Ryan Neal to play well again, and if Snacks Harrison plays, we should be a much better Defense.

Did you miss the first 2 weeks. Dunbar was the worst player on the field.

I didn't, and I have no idea what the hell you're talking about.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
10,007
Reaction score
1,702
Location
Sammamish, WA
Rat":3b46urjx said:
RCATES":3b46urjx said:
ivotuk":3b46urjx said:
"Kyler Murray is averaging 20+ points per game and will rack them up vs this Seattle Defense!."

" Start Christian Kirk vs Seattle "


We'll see. If Quentin Dunbar plays, this will be a different Defense. I expect Ryan Neal to play well again, and if Snacks Harrison plays, we should be a much better Defense.

Did you miss the first 2 weeks. Dunbar was the worst player on the field.

I didn't, and I have no idea what the hell you're talking about.

Based on their previous posts, I believe they don't either.
 
OP
OP
ivotuk

ivotuk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
23,107
Reaction score
1,824
Location
North Pole, Alaska
Somos doces":a9wwdwg8 said:
I'm guessing most QBs who have faced the Hawks this year have racked up some gaudy fantasy football numbers (apologies for my ignorance; I don't play FF). But really, unless players get thousands of points for a win, who gives a rip how many FF stats Murray accrues Sunday night, as long as the Hawks emerge victorious?

Never played either and know squawt about FF. Reason for posting was the "experts" opinion on how the game vs AZ is going to go.

They may be talking about FF, a game I know nothing about, but they are pretty good at what they do. However, I don't think they put in the effort when it comes to the Seattle games, and they'll find out how mistaken they are this Sunday.
 

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,264
Reaction score
3,142
Location
Spokane, WA
RCATES":i3vznsfq said:
ivotuk":i3vznsfq said:
"Kyler Murray is averaging 20+ points per game and will rack them up vs this Seattle Defense!."

" Start Christian Kirk vs Seattle "


We'll see. If Quentin Dunbar plays, this will be a different Defense. I expect Ryan Neal to play well again, and if Snacks Harrison plays, we should be a much better Defense.

Did you miss the first 2 weeks. Dunbar was the worst player on the field.

Are you sure you're not getting him confused with Tre Flowers?
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,527
Reaction score
856
Location
Phoenix az
RCATES":3khi6l4h said:
ivotuk":3khi6l4h said:
"Kyler Murray is averaging 20+ points per game and will rack them up vs this Seattle Defense!."

" Start Christian Kirk vs Seattle "


We'll see. If Quentin Dunbar plays, this will be a different Defense. I expect Ryan Neal to play well again, and if Snacks Harrison plays, we should be a much better Defense.

Did you miss the first 2 weeks. Dunbar was the worst player on the field.


I've read many of your takes, this one might be the strangest, and thats saying something.
 

FattyKnuckle

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2020
Messages
1,480
Reaction score
986
ivotuk":2ut1hrya said:
Somos doces":2ut1hrya said:
I'm guessing most QBs who have faced the Hawks this year have racked up some gaudy fantasy football numbers (apologies for my ignorance; I don't play FF). But really, unless players get thousands of points for a win, who gives a rip how many FF stats Murray accrues Sunday night, as long as the Hawks emerge victorious?

Never played either and know squawt about FF. Reason for posting was the "experts" opinion on how the game vs AZ is going to go.

They may be talking about FF, a game I know nothing about, but they are pretty good at what they do. However, I don't think they put in the effort when it comes to the Seattle games, and they'll find out how mistaken they are this Sunday.
You're completely wrong about the bolded. Not trying to be a jerk about it but you're (wrongly) accusing them of something that you yourself are actually doing. FF is about stats, period. Winning and losing mean nothing at all in FF. It's all stats, and considering the number of passing yards, and to a lesser degree TDs, that we give up, starting a decent to good QB against our defense is a given for FF. Doesn't matter if the QB is on the winning or losing team, they have all racked up heavy points against Seattle's D. I know that doesn't fit with the still-persisting, overwhelming feeling of no respect that has astoundingly continued unabated amongst the fanbase (longtime lurker here and Reddit), but there is absolutely no bias in the statement you are wrongly calling out as uninformed.

I'd be ecstatic if they do end u being mistaken by the time the final whistle blows, but unlike FF, all I care about are wins and losses. Don't get me wrong, I want Russ to get the stats needed to win MVP. But pulling us through adversity into wins is more important to me. It would be nice if he didn't need to though.
 

Basis4day

Active member
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
5,924
Reaction score
0
FattyKnuckle":w470c1gh said:
ivotuk":w470c1gh said:
Somos doces":w470c1gh said:
I'm guessing most QBs who have faced the Hawks this year have racked up some gaudy fantasy football numbers (apologies for my ignorance; I don't play FF). But really, unless players get thousands of points for a win, who gives a rip how many FF stats Murray accrues Sunday night, as long as the Hawks emerge victorious?

Never played either and know squawt about FF. Reason for posting was the "experts" opinion on how the game vs AZ is going to go.

They may be talking about FF, a game I know nothing about, but they are pretty good at what they do. However, I don't think they put in the effort when it comes to the Seattle games, and they'll find out how mistaken they are this Sunday.
You're completely wrong about the bolded. Not trying to be a jerk about it but you're (wrongly) accusing them of something that you yourself are actually doing. FF is about stats, period. Winning and losing mean nothing at all in FF. It's all stats, and considering the number of passing yards, and to a lesser degree TDs, that we give up, starting a decent to good QB against our defense is a given for FF. Doesn't matter if the QB is on the winning or losing team, they have all racked up heavy points against Seattle's D. I know that doesn't fit with the still-persisting, overwhelming feeling of no respect that has astoundingly continued unabated amongst the fanbase (longtime lurker here and Reddit), but there is absolutely no bias in the statement you are wrongly calling out as uninformed.

I'd be ecstatic if they do end u being mistaken by the time the final whistle blows, but unlike FF, all I care about are wins and losses. Don't get me wrong, I want Russ to get the stats needed to win MVP. But pulling us through adversity into wins is more important to me. It would be nice if he didn't need to though.

Yeah. Its clearly a fantasy discussion. The Hawks are weak against QB's in fantasy right now. 3rd Worst.
 
Top