And Turner ruins the game

[minormillikin]

Guys we did not loose because of 1 drop. We lost because we could not stop them, we lost because our first half game plan sucked, we lost because we had no run game outside of Wilson. That was one okay, we lost because of alot of plays and missed plays.

That's a moronic way to look at the game since any play in the 1st quarter is gonna be significantly less impactful then a drop for 1st down on our last drive to gain the lead and win the game.

Its moronic to think they lost because of more than one play? The fact that they needed Malik Turner to catch a pass or else they lose means something went very wrong beforehand.

 

[quadsas]

Guys we did not loose because of 1 drop. We lost because we could not stop them, we lost because our first half game plan sucked, we lost because we had no run game outside of Wilson. That was one okay, we lost because of alot of plays and missed plays.

That's a moronic way to look at the game since any play in the 1st quarter is gonna be significantly less impactful then a drop for 1st down on our last drive to gain the lead and win the game.

Really so ahh if we score 21 in the first qtr and they only score 10 guess what that score that got us 11 is the biggest play.

What's moronic is to say any 1 play coat you a game were there were mistake through out.

what?

 

[John63]

Guys we did not loose because of 1 drop. We lost because we could not stop them, we lost because our first half game plan sucked, we lost because we had no run game outside of Wilson. That was one okay, we lost because of alot of plays and missed plays.

That's a moronic way to look at the game since any play in the 1st quarter is gonna be significantly less impactful then a drop for 1st down on our last drive to gain the lead and win the game.

How impactful would you say an entire half and spotting them 18 was?

No defense for Turner but between Turner and the first half no show I know which one I blame more for the loss.

Or the constant 3ed and longs our defense gave up, or the missed field goal, or whiff by lynch on a block etc.

 

[quadsas]

Guys we did not loose because of 1 drop. We lost because we could not stop them, we lost because our first half game plan sucked, we lost because we had no run game outside of Wilson. That was one okay, we lost because of alot of plays and missed plays.

That's a moronic way to look at the game since any play in the 1st quarter is gonna be significantly less impactful then a drop for 1st down on our last drive to gain the lead and win the game.

Its moronic to think they lost because of more than one play? The fact that they needed Malik Turner to catch a pass or else they lose means something went very wrong beforehand.

Turner catching the ball completely negates everything that happened prior, I understand that such basic logic is incredibly tough to comprehend, but try.

 

[morgulon1]

Guys we did not loose because of 1 drop. We lost because we could not stop them, we lost because our first half game plan sucked, we lost because we had no run game outside of Wilson. That was one okay, we lost because of alot of plays and missed plays.

DUDE youre being too reasonable right now! :sarcasm_off:

 

[John63]

Guys we did not loose because of 1 drop. We lost because we could not stop them, we lost because our first half game plan sucked, we lost because we had no run game outside of Wilson. That was one okay, we lost because of alot of plays and missed plays.

That's a moronic way to look at the game since any play in the 1st quarter is gonna be significantly less impactful then a drop for 1st down on our last drive to gain the lead and win the game.

Its moronic to think they lost because of more than one play? The fact that they needed Malik Turner to catch a pass or else they lose means something went very wrong beforehand.

Turner catching the ball completely negates everything that happened prior, I understand that such basic logic is incredibly tough to comprehend, but try.

That's revisionist at best, you want to play that game the sack given up by infedi on 3rd and 5 negates the drop.

 

[jammerhawk]

For me I want to see Lano Hill in the review mirror, he's a SS that can't tackle, and he can't cover, besides that he's hurt half the time. I didn't think Turner played badly, but he wasn't great.

Not blue over the result, RW was special and needed more support. He didn't get the supporting cast to show up, save for Lockett, there were too many dropped balls and the team couldn't run the ball. The D gave up far too many key 3rd down conversions. There were lots of critical mistakes. Too many injuries.

 

[Year of The Hawk]

So with that logic if Turner caught that pass and we won should he alone then be credited for the win?

 

[quadsas]

So with that logic if Turner caught that pass and we won should he alone then be credited for the win?

If he goes for touchdown then sure.

 

[quadsas]

That's a moronic way to look at the game since any play in the 1st quarter is gonna be significantly less impactful then a drop for 1st down on our last drive to gain the lead and win the game.

Its moronic to think they lost because of more than one play? The fact that they needed Malik Turner to catch a pass or else they lose means something went very wrong beforehand.

Turner catching the ball completely negates everything that happened prior, I understand that such basic logic is incredibly tough to comprehend, but try.

That's revisionist at best, you want to play that game the sack given up by infedi on 3rd and 5 negates the drop.

Not sure why you are even commenting here when you haven't watched the game

 

[FloridaSeahawk18]

Also half-assed his route in the 1st and almost gave up a pick. Totally inept and not ready for this game. That fact that Ursua is on the bench and we trot this guy out week after week??? He must have dirt on Pete or something.

 

[John63]

So with that logic if Turner caught that pass and we won should he alone then be credited for the win?

If he goes for touchdown then sure.

No not if he scores if we win, since your saying the drop cost us the game. Even though he was not going to score, you cant now say he has to score to get credit for a win if we went on to win.

 

[quadsas]

So with that logic if Turner caught that pass and we won should he alone then be credited for the win?

If he goes for touchdown then sure.

No not if he scores if we win, since your saying the drop cost us the game. Even though he was not going to score, you cant now say he has to score to get credit for a win if we went on to win.

what are you talking about? seriously, whats wrong with you?

 

[John63]

Also half-assed his route in the 1st and almost gave up a pick. Totally inept and not ready for this game. That fact that Ursua is on the bench and we trot this guy out week after week??? He must have dirt on Pete or something.

I agree he did not play great, however outside of Wilson and lockett no one on offense did. Still he is not the reason we lost.

 

[Bobblehead]

Realy , what lost the game was giving up that pass ti "i'm Jimmy"

 

[John63]

Its moronic to think they lost because of more than one play? The fact that they needed Malik Turner to catch a pass or else they lose means something went very wrong beforehand.

Turner catching the ball completely negates everything that happened prior, I understand that such basic logic is incredibly tough to comprehend, but try.

That's revisionist at best, you want to play that game the sack given up by infedi on 3rd and 5 negates the drop.

Not sure why you are even commenting here when you haven't watched the game

You mean the game I watched with 10 friends and am now at home watching the replay. That game or the one you watched is your alternate reality from the rest of us.

 

[John63]

Realy , what lost the game was giving up that pass ti "i'm Jimmy"

Even that was. Not the reason we lost.

Look unless you play a perfect game and score a td every drive and loose no one player player costs you a game.

 

[12AngryHawks]

Yeah, cause if Turner didn't drop that one pass, they'd be guaranteed a TD.

 

[Bobblehead]

Realy , what lost the game was giving up that pass ti "i'm Jimmy"

Even that was. Not the reason we lost.

Look unless you play a perfect game and score a td every drive and loose no one player player costs you a game.

No, but it was there, where we couldn't win the game.

 

[quadsas]

Yeah, cause if Turner didn't drop that one pass, they'd be guaranteed a TD.

they'd be guaranteed a 1st and 10