theincrediblesok
New member
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2014
- Messages
- 1,550
- Reaction score
- 0
66 total plays
29 passing (including sack)
37 rushing
29 passing (including sack)
37 rushing
I'm talking baseline against somebody good on the road. From there if it's a walkover I expect 70-75 plays total. Basically we looked half speed last night.theincrediblesok":fngfpdg5 said:66 total plays
29 passing (including sack)
37 rushing
I'm talking baseline against somebody good on the road. From there if it's a walkover I expect 70-75 plays total. Basically we looked half speed last night.theincrediblesok":sf240klg said:66 total plays
29 passing (including sack)
37 rushing
MizzouHawkGal":1t92rqri said:I'm talking baseline against somebody good on the road. From there if it's a walkover I expect 70-75 plays total. Basically we looked half speed last night.theincrediblesok":1t92rqri said:66 total plays
29 passing (including sack)
37 rushing
Yes, because I've noticed since Wilson arrived we seem to run 50-55 plays a game. I believe we speed it up 5-10 plays because Pete is letting Wilson loose because he finally has his security blanket (Harvin).theincrediblesok":p9j5sj70 said:MizzouHawkGal":p9j5sj70 said:I'm talking baseline against somebody good on the road. From there if it's a walkover I expect 70-75 plays total. Basically we looked half speed last night.theincrediblesok":p9j5sj70 said:66 total plays
29 passing (including sack)
37 rushing
That was just a stat against the Packers pointing to the OP that we did more running plays than passing plays, we must of type out the reply at the same time as i didn't notice before you had stated about running 60 plays a game. Your right though about the half speed, there was some miss opportunities but they will fine tune that.
MizzouHawkGal":ii4g0moy said:Yes, because I've noticed since Wilson arrived we seem to run 50-55 plays a game. I believe we speed it up 5-10 plays because Pete is letting Wilson loose because he finally has his security blanket (Harvin).
kearly":1wj6ly8k said:It definitely felt like Seattle got away from the run in the 3rd quarter, which coincided with Seattle having a few difficult drives all of a sudden. There was a 1st and goal from the nine where I was literally screaming "RUN THE FREAKING BALL" at the TV. Seattle had two ineffective passes, and one nice run down to the two yard line. They ended up kicking a FG.
Yes, it did feel like Seattle passed too much in this game, but that's mostly because Lynch was so unstoppable, and because Green Bay's secondary played very well I thought. Had it been an ordinary game for Lynch I would be just fine, if not encouraged, by the willingness to pass. The one thing that disappointed me is that this new offense with Harvin seems to have sacrficed the deep ball. I expect Wilson's YPA to drop quite a bit this season until the figure out how to get the 50 yard pass play back in the offense.
Largent80":154ttmvx said:Bevell called the best game I have ever seen called by a Hawk O.C.
gowazzu02":k75f57kj said:Now hear me out.
The first or maybe second drive? of the 2nd half. MArshawn ripped two straight 10 plus yard gains. Turbo comes in rips another 10 yarder. Then we throw 3 straight incompletions!
It was clear they couldn't stop the beast. He had over 100 yards but it could of been 150 plus..imo.
They chose death by a thousand papercuts rather then the sword. Works for me.chris98251":17ah3i0u said:I think the deep ball suffered because they were playing off a lot, also why the jet sweep and Lynch dominated. They didn't want to get burned with the deep ball and hoped to contain us in front of them. They just didn't expect 10 yd sweeps and 10 yard runs up the gut. When they bit hard Lockette and Coleman scored, but if you look at the Lockette play they still had a deep safety that Lockette juked to get in.
I dunno, that NFCCG against the Panthers was pretty awesome.Largent80":1mrm5w7r said:Bevell called the best game I have ever seen called by a Hawk O.C.
idahohawk":1uwttt6x said:No.
gowazzu02":1uwttt6x said:Now hear me out.
The first or maybe second drive? of the 2nd half. MArshawn ripped two straight 10 plus yard gains. Turbo comes in rips another 10 yarder. Then we throw 3 straight incompletions!
It was clear they couldn't stop the beast. He had over 100 yards but it could of been 150 plus..imo.
Overall no, at certain times yes. Lynch was unstoppable, and there was a span where they didn't give it to him and we had to punt. Also a first and goal from the 9, I think we kicked a FG after some poor playcalling. That should have been handoff city to Lynch 3 times in a row if you must...... Just a little gripe, as Bevell will get into one of his brain fart ruts, butgowazzu02":3mmb51ar said:Now hear me out.
The first or maybe second drive? of the 2nd half. MArshawn ripped two straight 10 plus yard gains. Turbo comes in rips another 10 yarder. Then we throw 3 straight incompletions!
It was clear they couldn't stop the beast. He had over 100 yards but it could of been 150 plus..imo.
BlueTalon":3ubx5cod said:I dunno, that NFCCG against the Panthers was pretty awesome.Largent80":3ubx5cod said:Bevell called the best game I have ever seen called by a Hawk O.C.
gowazzu02":3ldh801p said:Now hear me out.
The first or maybe second drive? of the 2nd half. MArshawn ripped two straight 10 plus yard gains. Turbo comes in rips another 10 yarder. Then we throw 3 straight incompletions!
It was clear they couldn't stop the beast. He had over 100 yards but it could of been 150 plus..imo.