LawlessHawk
New member
No worries, PC will jump ahead of Belichick right after the Hawks complete their three-peat in Santa Clara.
Meeker":39h6m336 said:I wonder how the same GM ranked Belichick. Its not as if his schemes are innovative.
Sgt. Largent":3jlb75d6 said:Meeker":3jlb75d6 said:I wonder how the same GM ranked Belichick. Its not as if his schemes are innovative.
Actually Belichick is one of the most innovative schemers in NFL history, and is the strongest part of his coaching philosophy.
He's mastered taking away his opponents biggest strength, and pioneered the mastery of the bringing in practice squad players for the sheer purpose of mimicking his weekly opponents. Just to name a few.
I love Pete, but his innovations have been more on the HOW to coach and get the best out players side, rather than the X's and O's scheming of the game.
Here are a few links talking about Belichick's strategies and schemes
Meeker":1oxubg8o said:Sgt. Largent":1oxubg8o said:Meeker":1oxubg8o said:I wonder how the same GM ranked Belichick. Its not as if his schemes are innovative.
Actually Belichick is one of the most innovative schemers in NFL history, and is the strongest part of his coaching philosophy.
He's mastered taking away his opponents biggest strength, and pioneered the mastery of the bringing in practice squad players for the sheer purpose of mimicking his weekly opponents. Just to name a few.
I love Pete, but his innovations have been more on the HOW to coach and get the best out players side, rather than the X's and O's scheming of the game.
Here are a few links talking about Belichick's strategies and schemes
Belichick is a very good X's and O's coach, but thats not the same as innovative. What exactly about his defenses has been innovative? Also, the bolded has nothing to do with schemes, which is the only thing I'm talking about.
Sgt. Largent":17c6heb8 said:Meeker":17c6heb8 said:Sgt. Largent":17c6heb8 said:Meeker":17c6heb8 said:I wonder how the same GM ranked Belichick. Its not as if his schemes are innovative.
Actually Belichick is one of the most innovative schemers in NFL history, and is the strongest part of his coaching philosophy.
He's mastered taking away his opponents biggest strength, and pioneered the mastery of the bringing in practice squad players for the sheer purpose of mimicking his weekly opponents. Just to name a few.
I love Pete, but his innovations have been more on the HOW to coach and get the best out players side, rather than the X's and O's scheming of the game.
Here are a few links talking about Belichick's strategies and schemes
Belichick is a very good X's and O's coach, but thats not the same as innovative. What exactly about his defenses has been innovative? Also, the bolded has nothing to do with schemes, which is the only thing I'm talking about.
Bringing in practice squad players for the specific purpose of scheming against your opponents is innovative, and Belichick was adept at managing his roster during the year to maximize that.
He'd pull in guys off the street that were carbon copies of certain key players on his opponents teams, when most teams would try to find guys on their own roster, which rarely works because it's not the same type of player. So IMO that is very innovative.
Have you guys really never read or heard that Belichick is one of the great schemers? I thought that was common knowledge.
As bogus as the claims that Seattle cheated with PEDs or holding.Sarlacc83":3t5m2802 said:Belichek has helped himself to innovation by taping other team's practices. I mean, no one cares, but it goes to show the NFL doesn't, either.
Probably still a very good coach and number one by accomplishment, but his methods tend to be dubious at best.
HansGruber":1hepr9d1 said:As bogus as the claims that Seattle cheated with PEDs or holding.Sarlacc83":1hepr9d1 said:Belichek has helped himself to innovation by taping other team's practices. I mean, no one cares, but it goes to show the NFL doesn't, either.
Probably still a very good coach and number one by accomplishment, but his methods tend to be dubious at best.
How would anyone benefit by taping a practice? You build your game plan days or weeks before walk-throughs by watching film of their tendencies. By the time teams are doing walk throughs, they've already set their schemes and practiced for them. So you're going to ignore months worth of film and scouting because you saw your opponent practicing some plays you've already seen on film, at half speed, against their practice squad?
Fans just can't admit when some team is better than theirs so the excuses come out. We hate repeat winners. We root for underdogs and pray that the bad guys lose.
Cheating is the excuse of losers.
Smelly McUgly":2wm8nby4 said:HansGruber":2wm8nby4 said:Well, considering that Belichick is the best NFL coach in the history of the game, it's a flattering spot to place Carroll.
While I don't disagree with your post in spirit, Bill Walsh is probably actually the best NFL coach ever. He made the passing game extremely viable at the pro level, building on what Don Coryell did at SDSU.