Well, he isn't that fat guy with the goblet that destroyed our first Super Bowl team and more than anyone else, is responsible for why Walter Jones has no ring.
That is a positive.
But the issue I have with second chances is that you lose the ability to find someone that deserves a first chance.
And it was not just his decisions. Yes, he made terrible decisions as a GM based on his roster record.
But he compounded it by being a jerk. He was a toxic personality in the clubhouse, by many accounts.
So we are taking this massive chance that he is not going to make things unpleasant for others there.
At least with Scot, he might have been difficult to get along with (or drunk, I have no idea) but he had exceptional results - especially with juxtaposed with the cost.
This guy has terrible results AND might be a complete jerk.
BUT he isn't Ruskell. So I suppose that is a positive....is that better?