Blitzer88":3teyljm4 said:
Still love my Hawks think they can still extend Earl and Sherm but, Is anyone else as frustrated about this offseason as I am right now. I mean I knew we were gonna lose some of our guys, but I did not think we would lose, what, 12 of our free agents. Plus this is one offseason where guys seem to come visit and leave without a contract. That usually hasn't been the case with this front office. Also, we have yet to really fill any of those spots that were vacated by departing players and yes I know the draft is upcoming, but you can't fill every need in the draft. And yes I know I'll be bashed for being negative, but I was just expecting a lot more from this offseason. I am just starting to get worried. Okay, rant over for now.
my sentiments exactly. now they better extend earl and sherm, otherwise they honestly would have had wasted this offseason.
biggest blunder so far: not resigning giacomini. he signed in NY for 4 years at 18m. we could easily have had him at that price or less. we have no state income tax here and the COL is much less. we never even made an offer to him. sad. anybody who watched the whole season realizes how important it was to get him back after he missed 8 weeks. he stabilized the right side after RW was getting assaulted those 8 weeks.
i understand their philosophy of speed and youth, but sometimes, u just have to keep crucial players until you have their replacements handy. right now we dont have breno's replacement, and no bowie/bailey are TERRIBLE at RT. no argument if u watched the games. they are not the solution at RT, maybe at guard though. this puts us in a situation of probably having to draft RT in the first round or second round, when we could be targeting an elite OG, WR, DT or DE instead. just completely unnecessary if we had extended breno at 4m/year.
but.... atleast we didnt over-extend ourselves by over-paying older, declining, "big name" players. that is what teams like the raiders and jaguars (and broncos hahahaa) do.