DavidSeven":2nytu3ry said:
hawk45":2nytu3ry said:
DavidSeven":2nytu3ry said:
Most here loved the original Harvin deal and were clamoring for the Seahawks to burn a 1st rounder on a WR this year. Building an NFL roster is tough.
Yes, we do need better talent in the trenches. Paul Richardson also looks good.
There has been a chorus of fans pleading for OL help for years. That has been a consistent refrain.
I also wanted OL with the first pick. They used their second. Not bad. Britt looks okay. People weren't expecting Max to get hurt and for Okung to look like a shell of himself. No pick in the late 1st round would've addressed those issues.
Let's not pretend the vast majority of this fanbase hasn't been screaming for WRs over the last two years.
Agreed. And this why the vast majority seldom agree with my posts and I will start changing my perspectives when they do.
Perhaps the oldest football related adage: "the game is won and lost in the trenches" still rings true. it was that mentality that won Pete a Natty. Watching Wilson get hammered (in Stl, etc) last year should have been all the FO, or anyone, needed to see to fully understand the importance of OL over WR.
Putting this into perspective, I do now understand why the FO felt they needed a new Harvin, but still, you don't put the cart before the horse. Richardson should be a nice complement, but we were also more than fine with the WRs we had.