DJrmb":pqfqobd9 said:
I don't understand why people are wanting to address a position where we had injury problems by adding more players that have injury problems.
Unless you want to spend a lot of money there's going to be a trade-off.
To get a vet RB without an injury history you're going to have to trade in talent.
For my money, the thinking is that the Seahawks don't need somebody to be a below average every down back, as their cupboard at the position isn't bare.
With Rawls and Prosise they need someone who can be dynamic and part of that mix, and keep that mix going when one or two of the three of them go down with injury.
There's of course some risk in three dynamic backs all with injury history, but for a team majorly in contention I think you're much better off rolling that set of dice than spending money on a guy like Rashad Jennings, who really isn't going to help you more than Alex Collins would if Rawls and Prosise go down.
That's my thinking on it, at least.