The Radish
New member
If he indeed is going to be gone after this year I hope someone pays attention to his style of busting the chops of all receivers on that side of the field.
Whether some of you fans are hot on him or not every wideout in the league has bitched about his style more than once! A guy that gives those receivers something to think about other than catching the ball is a plus not likely to be replaced anytime soon.
For us old duffers its a pleasure to see receivers treated like they were in the 70s. Browner is one of the best I've ever seen at "chucking" the WO within 5 yards. But his best is he doesn't stop there but keeps on physically challanging the guy the entire play. And it has caused a lot of frustration at that position for the other teams.
I predicted once the officials got used to his style of play they would lay off a bit on him and I was right. So for those of you that think he's easily replaced remember it took this team since 1976 to find a defensive back that could cover like that, so be careful what you wish for.
When he's gone and they start making those offensive plays on that side because someone is not closely covering those guys it won't be long before you start saying "we should have kept Browner".
I agree we can find someone to play that position but I don't see anyone that will replace him.
:roll:
Whether some of you fans are hot on him or not every wideout in the league has bitched about his style more than once! A guy that gives those receivers something to think about other than catching the ball is a plus not likely to be replaced anytime soon.
For us old duffers its a pleasure to see receivers treated like they were in the 70s. Browner is one of the best I've ever seen at "chucking" the WO within 5 yards. But his best is he doesn't stop there but keeps on physically challanging the guy the entire play. And it has caused a lot of frustration at that position for the other teams.
I predicted once the officials got used to his style of play they would lay off a bit on him and I was right. So for those of you that think he's easily replaced remember it took this team since 1976 to find a defensive back that could cover like that, so be careful what you wish for.
When he's gone and they start making those offensive plays on that side because someone is not closely covering those guys it won't be long before you start saying "we should have kept Browner".
I agree we can find someone to play that position but I don't see anyone that will replace him.
:roll: