NFSeahawks
New member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2009
- Messages
- 4,714
- Reaction score
- 0
Fade":2zxyj5ay said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/CHawk_Talk/status/790419053630279680[/tweet]
Seems obvious but I won't get my hopes up.
Fade":2zxyj5ay said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/CHawk_Talk/status/790419053630279680[/tweet]
rjdriver":1r8qp3fg said:Joe will go to the Patriots for like a conditional fourth rounder.
I'm dead serious. It's black magic but it will happen. We will wake up soon and Joe Thomas will be a Patriot and it won't even phase me. We will offer a 2nd a 3rd and a fourth in 2017, and the Browns will still trade him to the Patriots for a bag of milk bones.
Of course it would be short sighted.Spin Doctor":hz8ygwcf said:Trading for Thomas would be a short sighted move from our FO. He is 31 years old, which suggest that he has maybe three years left of productivity, until he becomes a pedestrian LT. Thomas would also have to learn our blocking system on the fly, and would take some time to get up to speed. A second round pick is quite the premium to pay for a player, especially since much of our O-Line woes could be attributed to playcalling in my opinion.
The Seahawks are calling some strange plays given the circumstances surrounding our team.
Again, Joe Thomas is only a temporary solution, those high draft picks are important. You don't want to be handing them away every year. He is of the age that players start slowing down and becoming more injury prone. Even the greatest left tackle of his generation, Walter Jones was forced to hang up his cleats at the age of 34, which is only two years OLDER than Joe Thomas will be this December. Walter Jones, a player whom only missed 6 games his entire career before his last year, two of which was due him sitting because the Hawks had clenched the number one seed, or they couldn't go any hire in the seeding.Fade":1pc8ld5t said:Joe Thomas is extremely affordable, and cheap compared to what it would cost to get a Franchise LT on the open market, or trading a boatload of picks to move up in the draft, to get a young LT.
2016 - $4.2M
2017 - 2nd Rd Pick & $10M
2018 - $10M
That is cheap. Mediocre LTs hitting the market in the next couple of years are going to go for $15M plus.
The current D has about 3 yrs left, then it will have to be rebuilt. In 2019 Sherm & Kam will be 32, Mike B will be 35, Cliff Avril will be 34. KJ will be 31 etc, etc.
More so than worrying about the future. LT is extremely hard to find, they don't grow on trees. So when one becomes available for a reasonable price, you go get it.
It would be a huge coo for Seattle. Flipping their worst starting player into one of the best at his position.
Again, in two years he is going to be the same age as Walter Jones was when he retired. Even Walt was not the same player his last year. There is a chance that Joe Thomas can play for longer at a high level, but the odds are against him, especially considering Walter Jones's remarkable durability. Joe Thomas is at the tail end of his prime playing years. If we examine other HOF LT's you will see a similar trend. Jonathan Ogden was 33 when he retired, Orlando Pace 34, Willie Roaf 35. I think at the most you can expect out of Thomas is 3 years, but in reality it's all going to be downhill from here. He will be 32 in December of this year, and December of 2017 he will be the same age as Jonathon Ogden, Walter Jones, and one year younger than Orlando Pace. The Seahawks may not even get three years of solid, injury free play from Joe Thomas, the odds are stacked against him, especially since the tackles that I named were athletic freaks that possessed outstanding durability over their long-tenured NFL careers.Fade":19o6dw9i said:3 Playoff runs is far more than temporary. 3 years is an eternity in the NFL.
If it were a 1yr rental I would get your point. You're way off base on this one.
NFSeahawks628":1kedb97o said:Fade":1kedb97o said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/CHawk_Talk/status/790419053630279680[/tweet]
Seems obvious but I won't get my hopes up.
dontbelikethat":lmsn2mtw said:NFSeahawks628":lmsn2mtw said:Fade":lmsn2mtw said:[tweet]https://twitter.com/CHawk_Talk/status/790419053630279680[/tweet]
Seems obvious but I won't get my hopes up.
Don't have the most expertise with the cap, but I think they can carry over the unused cap if they don't spend it, so I would at least understand why they don't want to make a move. Plus they would obviously lose draft picks.