kearly":2i4y5vzj said:Given that Norman agreed to this deal so suddenly, it makes you wonder how badly Carolina was low-balling him.
Panthers offered 4 years $44 million. https://mobile.twitter.com/josephperson ... 3674292225
kearly":2i4y5vzj said:Given that Norman agreed to this deal so suddenly, it makes you wonder how badly Carolina was low-balling him.
ctrcat":16kxb6an said:kearly":16kxb6an said:Given that Norman agreed to this deal so suddenly, it makes you wonder how badly Carolina was low-balling him.
Panthers offered 4 years $44 million. https://mobile.twitter.com/josephperson ... 3674292225
Scottemojo":1txoekor said:The Skinners, and Scot, are building a team to be reckoned with.
If, and it's a big if Cousins plays as well as last year. I thought I read somewhere he played much better against lesser teams last year. Maybe not, but though I think he's pretty goid, I'm skeptical they're anything more than 9-7 with him at QB.Hawk_Nation":pyq0mbu0 said:This was exactly what Washington needed, him opposite Breeland is a damn good combo. If they can land a good safety later in the draft, and take a good Dline body with #21, they will win the East next season with ease.
Romo is going to get molly whopped. :thirishdrinkers:
hawksfansinceday1":lwtmhtcq said:If, and it's a big if Cousins plays as well as last year. I thought I read somewhere he played much better against lesser teams last year. Maybe not, but though I think he's pretty goid, I'm skeptical they're anything more than 9-7 with him at QB.Hawk_Nation":lwtmhtcq said:This was exactly what Washington needed, him opposite Breeland is a damn good combo. If they can land a good safety later in the draft, and take a good Dline body with #21, they will win the East next season with ease.
Romo is going to get molly whopped. :thirishdrinkers:
I know I'm late, but please allow this humble mod to lol.McGruff":hp4l1c94 said:Trenchbroom":hp4l1c94 said:Cut loose before the draft--that is interesting indeed.
And after the money has dried up. If I was Norman I'd be pissed.
hawksfansinceday1":1l639nzl said:If, and it's a big if Cousins plays as well as last year. I thought I read somewhere he played much better against lesser teams last year. Maybe not, but though I think he's pretty goid, I'm skeptical they're anything more than 9-7 with him at QB.Hawk_Nation":1l639nzl said:This was exactly what Washington needed, him opposite Breeland is a damn good combo. If they can land a good safety later in the draft, and take a good Dline body with #21, they will win the East next season with ease.
Romo is going to get molly whopped. :thirishdrinkers:
HawkAroundTheClock":7fhbycpm said:7 career interceptions.
3 total INTs over his first 3 years.
4 forced fumbles.
181 combined tackles.
53 games played.
1 season starting all 16 games.
28 years old.
50 million dollars guaranteed.
Thanks. I thought I read/heard that somewhere.CurryStopstheRuns":25jougb7 said:hawksfansinceday1":25jougb7 said:If, and it's a big if Cousins plays as well as last year. I thought I read somewhere he played much better against lesser teams last year. Maybe not, but though I think he's pretty goid, I'm skeptical they're anything more than 9-7 with him at QB.Hawk_Nation":25jougb7 said:This was exactly what Washington needed, him opposite Breeland is a damn good combo. If they can land a good safety later in the draft, and take a good Dline body with #21, they will win the East next season with ease.
Romo is going to get molly whopped. :thirishdrinkers:
He did not have any victories over teams with winning records, IIRC.
HawkAroundTheClock":unaj5u1h said:7 career interceptions.
3 total INTs over his first 3 years.
4 forced fumbles.
181 combined tackles.
53 games played.
1 season starting all 16 games.
28 years old.
50 million dollars guaranteed.
pehawk":3ktavwy9 said:Perfect signing for Scot. Tough, gritty, self made type. I don't question anything he does...even his drinking.
Marvin49":1dhhzbcq said:Sports Hernia":1dhhzbcq said:Doesn't really count though since a majority of that team was still built because of the previous no-cap years.Marvin49":1dhhzbcq said:Hawk_Nation":1dhhzbcq said:Win a Superbowl in the salary cap era then your point might hold some water. :thirishdrinkers:
1994.
Once the niners had to "build a team" and maintain a team in the salary cap era, 0 rings.
All true....
...Although they did have to figure out how to get all of those players under the cap in year on....which meant releasing/restructuing, and in the end signing Deion Sanders, Richard Dent, Ricky Jackson, Gary Plummer, Toi Cook, Charles Mann, and Bart Oates all that year. They also drafted Bryant Young and William Floyd.
I'm not going to make the case that they built the SB winning team under cap, but they did win it in the fisrt year of free agency and had to get under a cap that most teams werre under already and STILL won the SB that year.
I dunno...I always see people say stuff like "that was pre salary cap and it was easier". I don't think that really holds water as there was also no free agency...so no free agents to sign. If you didn't draft or trade a guy you were screwed. It created dynasties because you could keep teams together, but it was harder to assemble a great team.
Then again I've always looked at Free Agency as fools gold...so who knows.
There is THAT little nugget, I forgot about. Good call.RichNhansom":1cmfg2f9 said:Sports Hernia":1cmfg2f9 said:Marvin49":1cmfg2f9 said:Doesn't really count though since a majority of that team was still built because of the previous no-cap years.Hawk_Nation":1cmfg2f9 said:Win a Superbowl in the salary cap era then your point might hold some water. :thirishdrinkers:
1994.
Once the niners had to "build a team" and maintain a team in the salary cap era, 0 rings.
All true....
...Although they did have to figure out how to get all of those players under the cap in year on....which meant releasing/restructuing, and in the end signing Deion Sanders, Richard Dent, Ricky Jackson, Gary Plummer, Toi Cook, Charles Mann, and Bart Oates all that year. They also drafted Bryant Young and William Floyd.
I'm not going to make the case that they built the SB winning team under cap, but they did win it in the fisrt year of free agency and had to get under a cap that most teams werre under already and STILL won the SB that year.
I dunno...I always see people say stuff like "that was pre salary cap and it was easier". I don't think that really holds water as there was also no free agency...so no free agents to sign. If you didn't draft or trade a guy you were screwed. It created dynasties because you could keep teams together, but it was harder to assemble a great team.
Then again I've always looked at Free Agency as fools gold...so who knows.
You also have to consider they were caught cheating the cap. Not cheating like 9er fans try to accuse Pete of (ironically) but actually cheating by trying to pay players under the table. They were popped for this once and lost draft picks for it and lost more draft picks when caught cheating a second time a few years later negotiating with players they were not suppose to have contact with at the time iirc but two separate occasions they lost draft picks due to cheating and you know that if you were caught twice there were likely many other things that either didn't get caught or were burried under a rock.
Essentially that 1994 trophy still doesn't apply to the cap era because the 9ers weren't playing under the cap rules.
Sports Hernia":1udx33wn said:There is THAT little nugget, I forgot about. Good call.RichNhansom":1udx33wn said:You also have to consider they were caught cheating the cap. Not cheating like 9er fans try to accuse Pete of (ironically) but actually cheating by trying to pay players under the table. They were popped for this once and lost draft picks for it and lost more draft picks when caught cheating a second time a few years later negotiating with players they were not suppose to have contact with at the time iirc but two separate occasions they lost draft picks due to cheating and you know that if you were caught twice there were likely many other things that either didn't get caught or were burried under a rock.
Essentially that 1994 trophy still doesn't apply to the cap era because the 9ers weren't playing under the cap rules.
Most either are still in denial over it or, are too young to remember it.Jville":9j7nrprs said:Sports Hernia":9j7nrprs said:There is THAT little nugget, I forgot about. Good call.RichNhansom":9j7nrprs said:You also have to consider they were caught cheating the cap. Not cheating like 9er fans try to accuse Pete of (ironically) but actually cheating by trying to pay players under the table. They were popped for this once and lost draft picks for it and lost more draft picks when caught cheating a second time a few years later negotiating with players they were not suppose to have contact with at the time iirc but two separate occasions they lost draft picks due to cheating and you know that if you were caught twice there were likely many other things that either didn't get caught or were burried under a rock.
Essentially that 1994 trophy still doesn't apply to the cap era because the 9ers weren't playing under the cap rules.
Gosh ...... I wonder why none of the niner fans mentioned that footnote.
Jville":s3wgippf said:Sports Hernia":s3wgippf said:There is THAT little nugget, I forgot about. Good call.RichNhansom":s3wgippf said:You also have to consider they were caught cheating the cap. Not cheating like 9er fans try to accuse Pete of (ironically) but actually cheating by trying to pay players under the table. They were popped for this once and lost draft picks for it and lost more draft picks when caught cheating a second time a few years later negotiating with players they were not suppose to have contact with at the time iirc but two separate occasions they lost draft picks due to cheating and you know that if you were caught twice there were likely many other things that either didn't get caught or were burried under a rock.
Essentially that 1994 trophy still doesn't apply to the cap era because the 9ers weren't playing under the cap rules.
Gosh ...... I wonder why none of the niner fans mentioned that footnote.