SPIRITOF12
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2014
- Messages
- 558
- Reaction score
- 29
Using undoubtedly your #1 go-to receiver to return kicks seems like a dumb idea.
Lockett returning kicks- why the risk?
- Thread starter SPIRITOF12
- Start date
Palmegranite
Well-known member
DJ Dallas was sitting at the kids bench on a timeout for bad behaviour.
TwistedHusky
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2013
- Messages
- 6,916
- Reaction score
- 1,108
It was mindblowingly stupid.
There is no excuse.
Use anyone else and make them fair catch if you have to.
But Tyler shouldn't be back on kicks EVER.
It was probably fair that we had the turnover on one of those, because he never should have been back there.
Pissed me off, because no upside there is worth the injury risk.
Reminds me of when we were stupidly using ET and Sherman as returners.
There is no excuse.
Use anyone else and make them fair catch if you have to.
But Tyler shouldn't be back on kicks EVER.
It was probably fair that we had the turnover on one of those, because he never should have been back there.
Pissed me off, because no upside there is worth the injury risk.
Reminds me of when we were stupidly using ET and Sherman as returners.
FattyKnuckle
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,480
- Reaction score
- 986
In a day of terrible coaching decisions, that was one of the worst.
Kindy funny because Pete has went away from this for awhile. Why the change now? I will say though that Lockett never take a hit. Shoot even when nobody is around he gets down for no reason. Feels like Pete just doesn't trust anyone else back there.
