Sac
Active member
In place of Browner, opposite Sherman, if you can.
Consider scheme fit, cost, and playing style.
I'm hard pressed to do so myself.
Consider scheme fit, cost, and playing style.
I'm hard pressed to do so myself.
If Thurmond remains healthy I wouldn't I am in complete agreement even though a healthy Revis is the best Browner is a tone setter and far better cover corner than given credit for and fits our system far better this not counting Revis' s me first disruptive to team chemistry antics.SacHawk2.0":1yz8kmzb said:In place of Browner, opposite Sherman, if you can.
Consider scheme fit, cost, and playing style.
I'm hard pressed to do so myself.
oooohhhh.....Roland's gonna :192215: you for that grammar masterpiece.KCHawkGirl":39sir2wm said:If Thurmond remains healthy I wouldn't I am in complete agreement even though a healthy Revis is the best Browner is a tone setter and far better cover corner than given credit for and fits our system far better this not counting Revis' s me first disruptive to team chemistry antics.SacHawk2.0":39sir2wm said:In place of Browner, opposite Sherman, if you can.
Consider scheme fit, cost, and playing style.
I'm hard pressed to do so myself.
Lester Hayes and Mike Haynes were the Raider CBs IIRC.KCHawkGirl":1fnfc3lc said:Current or past CB's? If current I can only think of two....Tillman and a healthy Revis if past I think Zebulon's list suffices especially if you remove Brown and go with Ronnie Lott. There are others like the Raiders CB's of the 70's that wouldn't be wrong either.
Zebulon Dak":1qxcaesm said:Deion Sanders
Darrell Green
Rod Woodson
Mel Blount
Dave Brown
SacHawk2.0":2cf2wawq said:Pretty sure I said current QBs and said money was a consideration.