Nick Vannet

SeahawksEast

Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2010
Messages
122
Reaction score
0
For the money, I'd rather re-up Sheldon R., P-Rich, and Luke Willson over the expense of Jimmy G. That is not a slight towards Jimmy who is an elite pass catching TE, just an age and expense thing. Roll into next season with Luke and Nick at TE and really, Sheldon is the key signing for next year. He continually gobbles up two opposing O-line to free up B. Wagz to be the DPOY that he is. If you think about it, Sheldon's impact to the D is far greater than Jimmy G to the O, and again, no disrespect towards Jimmy intended, I'm speaking strictly from a "chess piece" valuation - factoring in age, impact, need, etc
 

iigakusei

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,856
Reaction score
1
I think some really underestimate how important JG is.
If the money for him or P Rich is even in the same ballpark (and my all accounts it will be) I am taking JG each and every time.
 

pugs1

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
675
Reaction score
9
Location
Jackson, Mississippi
Seanhawk":d56dsc1x said:
djb28":d56dsc1x said:
Oh no.. we don't get rid of him. It's taken 2 yrs for this project to click. It's in full force now.

I would like to thank this post for opening up the possibility of doing this:

[youtube]i28UEoLXVFQ[/youtube]

I hope this opens up the possibility of more hair metal videos to be posted here! Don't know what you got till it's gone... Damn I miss those days!
 

HawkerD

Active member
Joined
Oct 19, 2014
Messages
1,042
Reaction score
0
Location
Covington WA
Jimjones0384":25ur0nep said:
HawkerD":25ur0nep said:
chris98251":25ur0nep said:
This is why Graham will not be signed, add Willson and Swoopes on the PS squad and were not in dire straights.
Jimmy will be resigned. Red zone TD machine. They don't grow on trees.

Yep, and TE money has been driven down. One blog I was reading somewhere estimates around 7 mil a year. I don't think Paul will be back, unfortunately. Some team is going to offer him a Maxwell like contract.

:ditto: This is what I believe will happen. $7M is a bargain for a TD machine. 2-3 year deal.
 

HawkerD

Active member
Joined
Oct 19, 2014
Messages
1,042
Reaction score
0
Location
Covington WA
iigakusei":5q6egmu1 said:
I think some really underestimate how important JG is.
If the money for him or P Rich is even in the same ballpark (and my all accounts it will be) I am taking JG each and every time.

Exactly.

Anyone who is willing to pay PRich the same as you would NOT pay Graham then I am glad you are not the GM.
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,931
Reaction score
474
chris98251":20n330fx said:
HawkerD":20n330fx said:
chris98251":20n330fx said:
This is why Graham will not be signed, add Willson and Swoopes on the PS squad and were not in dire straights.
Jimmy will be resigned. Red zone TD machine. They don't grow on trees.

How long did it take this tree to grow in our offense is the reason why, he is playing for 15 Million a year right now.

Wrong question to ask.

Question to ask is, do you really want to omit double-digit touchdowns from this offense next year just to "punish" our coaching staff and front office for not utilizing him better?
 

scrummymustard

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
HawkerD":3n1sqf8x said:
Jimjones0384":3n1sqf8x said:
HawkerD":3n1sqf8x said:
chris98251":3n1sqf8x said:
This is why Graham will not be signed, add Willson and Swoopes on the PS squad and were not in dire straights.
Jimmy will be resigned. Red zone TD machine. They don't grow on trees.

Yep, and TE money has been driven down. One blog I was reading somewhere estimates around 7 mil a year. I don't think Paul will be back, unfortunately. Some team is going to offer him a Maxwell like contract.

:ditto: This is what I believe will happen. $7M is a bargain for a TD machine. 2-3 year deal.

I doubt $7 mil per gets it done,but you never know.

A 35 year old witten signed for 4 years at $7.4 per. The top tier hasn't risen, but the mid tier guys make $6-7 a year now (sims, j. thomas, v. mcdonald, doyle, fiedorowicz, gresham, fleener, d. allen). None of those guys are in the same league as graham, IMO.

The TE free agent market (or lack there of) will also drive up the price. The top FA TEs available will be graham, brate, ASJ & an oft injured Eifert who has never played a full season and missed 41 games in 5 years.

Who knows if he will be priced out for the hawks, but this would be a much different season without him right now.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
29,405
Reaction score
5,442
Location
Kent, WA
It wouldn't surprise me if JG seeks more money elsewhere, but I've often wondered...Was Jimmy thinking of getting one more ring before retiring? Maybe if we go all the way this year, he'll hang them up.

IAE, while I'd like to have JG hang around, I'm not super scared about moving forward with Willson/Vannett/rookie-FA. :229031_shrug:
 

Seymour

Active member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
7,459
Reaction score
22
chris98251":21k1tl0j said:
HawkerD":21k1tl0j said:
chris98251":21k1tl0j said:
This is why Graham will not be signed, add Willson and Swoopes on the PS squad and were not in dire straights.
Jimmy will be resigned. Red zone TD machine. They don't grow on trees.

How long did it take this tree to grow in our offense is the reason why, he is playing for 15 Million a year right now.

Graham makes 10M now but I agree. Lets also remember the drops and the half hearted blocking and route running early in the year. Pete had a sit down chat with him and Graham has been money ever since. A player making that kind of $$ should not require that level of intervention to do their job.

Thanks for the TD's but bye Jimmy.
 

scrummymustard

New member
Joined
Sep 14, 2015
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
Seymour":2yfa9zyt said:
chris98251":2yfa9zyt said:
HawkerD":2yfa9zyt said:
chris98251":2yfa9zyt said:
This is why Graham will not be signed, add Willson and Swoopes on the PS squad and were not in dire straights.
Jimmy will be resigned. Red zone TD machine. They don't grow on trees.

How long did it take this tree to grow in our offense is the reason why, he is playing for 15 Million a year right now.

Graham makes 10M now but I agree. Lets also remember the drops and the half hearted blocking and route running early in the year. Pete had a sit down chat with him and Graham has been money ever since. A player making that kind of $$ should not require that level of intervention to do their job.

Thanks for the TD's but bye Jimmy.

Where did you see that they had a sit down? I had not seen that reported anywhere.
 

xgeoff

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
1,948
Reaction score
185
I was a big proponent for drafting Vannett. Thought he looked great in the Senior Bowl and was excited that we drafted him. That being said, I think he's largely been a disappointment. In college I saw him block well and run slick routes with good hands. Until yesterday I haven't seen him do that at the pro level.

I was really psyched to see his play yesterday, and he displayed all of the talents that I saw him display at Ohio State. He ran good routes, displayed good hands, and blocked well, including a beautiful escort of Mike Davis on a sweep play.

Lots of potential here. Hope he is able to keep it up!
 

Seymour

Active member
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
7,459
Reaction score
22
scrummymustard":2820tu2a said:
Seymour":2820tu2a said:
chris98251":2820tu2a said:
HawkerD":2820tu2a said:
Jimmy will be resigned. Red zone TD machine. They don't grow on trees.

How long did it take this tree to grow in our offense is the reason why, he is playing for 15 Million a year right now.

Graham makes 10M now but I agree. Lets also remember the drops and the half hearted blocking and route running early in the year. Pete had a sit down chat with him and Graham has been money ever since. A player making that kind of $$ should not require that level of intervention to do their job.

Thanks for the TD's but bye Jimmy.

Where did you see that they had a sit down? I had not seen that reported anywhere.

It wasn't widely publicized, but I believe it was Warren Moon that brought this up during a post game show about 6 weeks ago.
 

xgeoff

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
1,948
Reaction score
185
Seymour":1ysy0h1a said:
scrummymustard":1ysy0h1a said:
Seymour":1ysy0h1a said:
chris98251":1ysy0h1a said:
How long did it take this tree to grow in our offense is the reason why, he is playing for 15 Million a year right now.

Graham makes 10M now but I agree. Lets also remember the drops and the half hearted blocking and route running early in the year. Pete had a sit down chat with him and Graham has been money ever since. A player making that kind of $$ should not require that level of intervention to do their job.

Thanks for the TD's but bye Jimmy.

Where did you see that they had a sit down? I had not seen that reported anywhere.

It wasn't widely publicized, but I believe it was Warren Moon that brought this up during a post game show about 6 weeks ago.

He had some more half-hearted blocking attempts last night. I'm torn. I love the redzone productivity, and he makes some great catches. But his blocking is poor and he can get the dropsies. I honestly don't think he's worth the money, but it's a tough decision with the way he is producing right now.
 

mrt144

New member
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
4,065
Reaction score
0
xgeoff":2ubkgv2o said:
I was a big proponent for drafting Vannett. Thought he looked great in the Senior Bowl and was excited that we drafted him. That being said, I think he's largely been a disappointment. In college I saw him block well and run slick routes with good hands. Until yesterday I haven't seen him do that at the pro level.

I was really psyched to see his play yesterday, and he displayed all of the talents that I saw him display at Ohio State. He ran good routes, displayed good hands, and blocked well, including a beautiful escort of Mike Davis on a sweep play.

Lots of potential here. Hope he is able to keep it up!

I also followed him at Ohio State and if settles into a 600-700 yard, 4-6 TD contributor with good blocking that'll be just dandy. Also being an under the radar kind of threat now also is good.
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,931
Reaction score
474
On further review, he had a nice lead block on Wilson's first read-option run.
 

Mojambo

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1,655
Reaction score
0
Speaking of that first play, I think Seattle should open every game with some sort of designed run for Wilson. I think it functions like an early adrenaline soak for the perpetually amped Wilson.

Not to mention what it does to the defense.
 

quadsas

New member
Joined
Oct 14, 2012
Messages
946
Reaction score
0
If Vannett gets to Zach Miller level, I would probably have to stick with him over Jimmy.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,717
Reaction score
1,747
Location
Roy Wa.
He lines up as a WR a lot and like last time is going to push for WR money again. 10 million now go for 15 next, he may not get it but I would think he would start there.
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,931
Reaction score
474
xgeoff":v87ootsj said:
I honestly don't think he's worth the money, but it's a tough decision with the way he is producing right now.

And that is our dilemma when judging whether Graham is worth a new contract. Same boat as Kam Chancellor and, one could argue, Jermaine Kearse and Jeremy Lane.

They are, or were, "8.5 out of 10" players (at least on this team). Unfortunately, you can't pay them like 8.5 players, because they'll walk to someone who will offer them "10 out of 10" money. And we can't risk that because 8.5 production is not something we can just plug in. So we wind up overpaying players because they're too good to easily be replaced, but not quite good enough to merit those enormous contracts.

For me, I pay Jimmy and keep developing Vannett. Jimmy's current performance isn't a "contract year" anomaly. He was 3rd in the league in receptions last year (at his position). If others are really so annoyed at Bevell for taking so long to unleash him in the red zone that they would rather see him walk, that's their choice. But if you take a cold, objective look at the tape, neither Luke Willson nor Nick Vannett have given anyone reason to think they can match Jimmy's talent level, and they certainly won't once they're doubled by defenses as the team's #1 TE.

If Seattle wants to let 1 touchdown per game walk, they'd better have a McDougald-style under-the-radar free agent signing in the works, or a high draft target, at that position. And given we lack a 2nd- or 3rd-round pick next year, the margin is unusually narrow.
 
Top