Sgt. Largent":14z838us said:seahawk12thman":14z838us said:Sgt. Largent":14z838us said:seahawk12thman":14z838us said:Britt was a rookie, how many rookies started at right tackle last year?? I didn't say they played well but they should have scored a touchdown on their second drive. I am simply saying the sky isn't falling. Lets assume Britt was good in your opinion, who should play left guard??
Not sure why this is so difficult for you.
It's not difficult.
You're saying Britt was moved to left guard because we need a left guard, and I'm saying he was moved to left guard because he was an inferior RT, especially in pass protection.
No team in the history of the NFL moves a great, or even very good RT to guard because of need. Tackles are much harder to find than guards, so you never move a good one out of need..............you move them because they're not playing well, or don't have the potential to solidify that position.
Gilliam can't play guard, he isn't big enough. Yes, Britt was moved to left guard because the play there was less than average. So you are saying Britt would have been replaced by Gilliam if Bailey was the guard we were hoping he would be???
Definitely a possibility.
My guess is Pete and Tom wanted to give Britt a chance during OTA's and the first pre-season game to see if there was any growth with his pass pro issues from last year. The verdict was a resounding no, thus the move.
Nothing against Britt, he was iffy at RT from the get go, which is why Cable told him when he was drafted that he could end up at guard.
I'm merely contradicting your assertion that the O-line wasn't as bad as it appeared Friday. It was, and the shuffling and rotation of new players into the starting 5 proves me right.
StoneCold":gkspzjqm said:seahawk12thman":gkspzjqm said:Sgt. Largent":gkspzjqm said:seahawk12thman":gkspzjqm said:Britt was a rookie, how many rookies started at right tackle last year?? I didn't say they played well but they should have scored a touchdown on their second drive. I am simply saying the sky isn't falling. Lets assume Britt was good in your opinion, who should play left guard??
Not sure why this is so difficult for you.
It's not difficult.
You're saying Britt was moved to left guard because we need a left guard, and I'm saying he was moved to left guard because he was an inferior RT, especially in pass protection.
No team in the history of the NFL moves a great, or even very good RT to guard because of need. Tackles are much harder to find than guards, so you never move a good one out of need..............you move them because they're not playing well, or don't have the potential to solidify that position.
Gilliam can't play guard, he isn't big enough. Yes, Britt was moved to left guard because the play there was less than average. So you are saying Britt would have been replaced by Gilliam if Bailey was the guard we were hoping he would be???
Gilliam is taller and heavier than Sweezy. Not trying to be argumentative as I appreciate your positive spin.
seahawk12thman":e3u22586 said:No it wasn't a possibility, which is why you tried to change it back to offensive lines play Friday night. There was no chance that Gilliam was taking Britt's job and you know this. One drive that should have culminated into a touchdown isn't a bad night. Getting worked by Von Miller (the best left end in football INHO) is no disgrace either. Cables assesment of the first team offense was "OK" and he was right. The play of the 2nd and 3rd team is another story... This makes the line better and that is the job of the coaches to upgrade. It proves you have no idea what you are talking about and are grasping at straws.. :34853_doh:
Britt had one bad play but after that he was pretty solid.
seahawk12thman":efpza4si said:Gilliam can't play guard, he isn't big enough. Yes, Britt was moved to left guard because the play there was less than average. So you are saying Britt would have been replaced by Gilliam if Bailey was the guard we were hoping he would be???
StoneCold":efpza4si said:Gilliam is taller and heavier than Sweezy. Not trying to be argumentative as I appreciate your positive spin.
seahawk12thman":efpza4si said:I am not sure where Sweezy comes into play here?
StoneCold":1kwg6i7p said:seahawk12thman":1kwg6i7p said:Gilliam can't play guard, he isn't big enough. Yes, Britt was moved to left guard because the play there was less than average. So you are saying Britt would have been replaced by Gilliam if Bailey was the guard we were hoping he would be???
StoneCold":1kwg6i7p said:Gilliam is taller and heavier than Sweezy. Not trying to be argumentative as I appreciate your positive spin.
seahawk12thman":1kwg6i7p said:I am not sure where Sweezy comes into play here?
You said Gilliam can't play guard because he isn't big enough. Sweezy is a guard and Gilliam is bigger.
Sgt. Largent":3vd4jv8m said:seahawk12thman":3vd4jv8m said:No it wasn't a possibility, which is why you tried to change it back to offensive lines play Friday night. There was no chance that Gilliam was taking Britt's job and you know this. One drive that should have culminated into a touchdown isn't a bad night. Getting worked by Von Miller (the best left end in football INHO) is no disgrace either. Cables assesment of the first team offense was "OK" and he was right. The play of the 2nd and 3rd team is another story... This makes the line better and that is the job of the coaches to upgrade. It proves you have no idea what you are talking about and are grasping at straws.. :34853_doh:
This is grasping at straws.
Britt had one bad play but after that he was pretty solid.
I will leave you now to defend your delusional O-line mumbo jumbo with other forum goers. God speed.
netskier":2xkiufic said:Based on the official roster, Gilliam is six pounds bigger than sweezy, but the roster seems to have a lot of stale data in it, so how reliable is it?
Who do we email to request updating?
The 230 pound Mathews is still listed at last year's 218 pound weight, for example.