Poor, poor Falcons....

[NINEster]

Interesting stat about that 2012 playoff game:

The '89 LA Rams were the NFC West team to win two back to back east coast playoff games (wild card & divisional round, Eagles & Giants), which is what the Seahawks were up against themselves.

The Niners were participants in both '89 and '12 NFCC, winning both, so the road was certainly challenging had Matt Bryant not kicked the game winner that day.

 

[ivotuk]

We owe them for 2912 and they can suck a brontosaurus.

I'm going to assume you meant 2012. Those keys are right next to each other after all...

Actually he meant 1912, and yes, he is that old! :les:

 

[nanomoz]

It's kind of perfect that they play Denver before they play the 'Hawks. I'm used to worst-case week before scenarios: good teams fresh off of their bye week, or off of an awful performance so they'll be extra focused.

 

[Seymour]

We owe them for 2912 and they can suck a brontosaurus.

I'm going to assume you meant 2012. Those keys are right next to each other after all...

Actually he meant 1912, and yes, he is that old! :les:

Based on the brontosaurus comment, I'll go with 2912 BC. :3-1:

 

[Boycie]

If the Falcons lose to the Broncos, there is a good chance they lose to us, either way they will be beat up by that defense, and then they will come here and play against another physical defense. Falcons will have to try and run the ball and not throw all over the place. I'm thinking our guys will be ready for the pass attack. This team has two weeks to prepare for them. Their defense we can score on, it's whether their offense can score on us that's the question.

This plays right into our strengths. They have a suspect D, and the game plan should be to sustain long drives that results in points to manage the clock(call me Captain Obvious here), and keep their offense off of the field.

I think a healthy dose of C-Mike, and CJ for this game should be in order.

 

[BlueThunder]

We owe them for 2912 and they can suck a brontosaurus.

I'm going to assume you meant 2012. Those keys are right next to each other after all...

Actually he meant 1912, and yes, he is that old! :les:

Based on the brontosaurus comment, I'll go with 2912 BC. :3-1:

I think that may be closer to say 291.2 million BC...

 

[LeftHandSmoke]

Based on the brontosaurus comment, I'll go with 2912 BC. :3-1:

I think that may be closer to say 291.2 million BC...

Cool it hot-shot.

The only hoax bigger than Global Warming is Brontosaurus fossils. Go figure - they both come from China!

 

[BlueThunder]

Based on the brontosaurus comment, I'll go with 2912 BC. :3-1:

I think that may be closer to say 291.2 million BC...

Cool it hot-shot.

The only hoax bigger than Global Warming is Brontosaurus fossils. Go figure - they both come from China!

You forgot your :sarcasm_on: icon... (I hope)... :34853_doh:

But I was just messing with his numbers. Actual brontosaurus species were roughly 150-155 million years ago... According to ACTUAL fossil evidence and carbon dating... But this isn't the non-existent PWR forum, so shut up. And yeah, those Falcons are gonna be hurting after this upcoming 2-game beat-down... And people will quit talkin' about 'em....

 

[LeftHandSmoke]

Based on the brontosaurus comment, I'll go with 2912 BC. :3-1:

I think that may be closer to say 291.2 million BC...

Cool it hot-shot.

The only hoax bigger than Global Warming is Brontosaurus fossils. Go figure - they both come from China!

You forgot your :sarcasm_on: icon... (I hope)... :34853_doh:

But I was just messing with his numbers. Actual brontosaurus species were roughly 150-155 million years ago... According to ACTUAL fossil evidence and carbon dating... But this isn't the non-existent PWR forum, so shut up. And yeah, those Falcons are gonna be hurting after this upcoming 2-game beat-down... And people will quit talkin' about 'em....

Nailed it, on all counts - Cheers

 

[BlueThunder]

Nailed it, on all counts - Cheers

Well, that's a head-scratching answer.... :?

'round here, ya gotta make things a bit more obvious. Still don't know if you're with me or against me... :lol:

 

[LeftHandSmoke]

Nailed it, on all counts - Cheers

Ummmm... Which counts? Couldn't be "ALL"....

Okay, you did miss on the years but did correct for it and originally had the order of magnitude about right anyway.

I forget, how are Brontosaurs and Falcons related anyway? Maybe it was an evolutionary/topic-thread branch of a different kind.. Except for their ultimate fates, of course!

Falcons are interesting but another intriguing team, besides the Rams too, is the Eagles. If the Cards can't beat SF tonight then things look even better for the Hawks.

 

[BlueThunder]

Nailed it, on all counts - Cheers

Ummmm... Which counts? Couldn't be "ALL"....

I forget, how are Brontosaurs and Falcons related anyway? Maybe it was an evolutionary/topic-thread branch of a different kind.. Except for their ultimate fates, of course!

Hey, you started it, but ok.... But my ultimate question with you has been answered... i.e., "not a dumbass"... :lol: We cool. :irishdrinkers:

 

[LeftHandSmoke]

:2thumbs:

This Niners/Cards game is getting rough. Let's hope the Broncs/Falcons game is as good.

 

[MontanaHawk05]

If the Falcons lose to the Broncos, there is a good chance they lose to us, either way they will be beat up by that defense, and then they will come here and play against another physical defense. Falcons will have to try and run the ball and not throw all over the place. I'm thinking our guys will be ready for the pass attack. This team has two weeks to prepare for them. Their defense we can score on, it's whether their offense can score on us that's the question.

This plays right into our strengths. They have a suspect D, and the game plan should be to sustain long drives that results in points to manage the clock(call me Captain Obvious here), and keep their offense off of the field.

I think a healthy dose of C-Mike, and CJ for this game should be in order.

I predict 150+ rushing yards for the Hawks against Atlanta.

 

[stack55]

Don't forget Dan Quinn knows our playbook like the back of
His hands. If any team is prepared it will be the Falcons.

 

[HawKnPeppa]

Don't forget Dan Quinn knows our playbook like the back of
His hands. If any team is prepared it will be the Falcons.

Yup! He of all people should know how to best defend against our ZBS. Question is does he have the horses.

Sent from my SC-02H using Tapatalk

 

[PlinytheCenter]

Dan Quinns' team is not going to beat us. Whether by 20 or 2 points, the Hawks will prevail.

 

[Sports Hernia]

Don't forget Dan Quinn knows our playbook like the back of
His hands. If any team is prepared it will be the Falcons.

He doesn't have the talent though.

 

[BlueThunder]

Not to mention I doubt the playbook is exactly the same as it was when Dan left...

 

[FlyingGreg]

Don't forget Dan Quinn knows our playbook like the back of
His hands. If any team is prepared it will be the Falcons.

Goes both ways. We know his defense and style intimately as well.