RichNhansom":r27rhq7w said:
I don't have a problem with his breakdown but you have to remember this is a view from someone that would like to see Wilson struggle. I know he wants to come off as being unbiased and does a good job trying but really if he tries to say he isn't rooting for Russell to fail, he would simply be lying.
With the key sentence here being you don't have a problem with my breakdown. As for the rest, you're simply wrong.
Of course I root against the Hawks when they play the 9ers. That's obvious. Also obvious from my entire posting history is that I really, really enjoy watching (and root for) many of the Hawks' players (e.g. Lynch, Bennett, Sherman, Tate when he was with the team, etc.). Wilson is one of those guys. As I've been saying since his rookie year he reminds me more of Steve Young -- my favorite QB -- than any other NFL player I've ever seen. I've been nothing if not consistent here and even on 9ers forums in saying how much I enjoy watching Wilson play. Put another way, your conspiracy theory is a dud. You should instead evaluate my arguments based in their own merits, not based on hidden meanings or subterfuge.
RichNhansom":r27rhq7w said:
He is not completely wrong on his pocket analysis but he ignores the talent around Wilson has decreased. The O-line is probably on par but the receiving corp has downgraded with the losses of Miller, Tate and Rice, If he is even staying close to par in his development and not declining it is a plus.
This too is incorrect. I think one problem we're having is you're implicitly conflating "development" with statistics. Wilson's statistics could go down while his development in the areas I've discussed increased. This could happen because the talent around him decreases (as you suggest) or because he is DEVELOPING new skills that temporarily make him worse statistically as he's no longer leaning on his old crutches, but make him a superior player in the long run. The corrolary is also true: his development can flatline while his statistics increase.
This is true of all players.
RichNhansom":r27rhq7w said:
His accuracy on crossing patterns has definitely been something he needed to work on and IMO he has improved on this but again a more consistent WR corp would also help in that development.
Again, this is about completion %, not accuracy. If we're talking QB development I don't care if a WR drops or catches a ball, I care about where it was placed in relation to the receiver and defender. And if the WR isn't that great and there's only a small window for the completion I want to know if the QB is stepping into and manipulating the pocket to check his other reads, and if he doesn't, WHERE he is missing when throwing into tight coverage in relation to the defenders. Wilson is hot and cold with his ball placement; when he's cold the problem isn't that tight coverage results in incompletions, the problem is that when he's cold his ball placement is just way off regardless of if the coverage is tight or not.
RichNhansom":r27rhq7w said:
Saying the O-line and receivers being poor should help his development is the only thing I take notice with. It ignores what makes good QB's good. Confidence. Confidence is not something you just get you have to get it from having success and that success needs to be consistent for you to believe in it. With a constant flux in the O-line and lacking true talent to at WR and TE you will be hard pressed to get that consistent success. If anything that is usually the reason QB's regress.
Again, you're talking about "consistent success." I'm not talking about success or stats. I'm talking about what Wilson DOES. There are skills QBs develop (or don't) which don't always lead to short term success (they're DEVELOPING the skills) and certainly don't mean a play will be succesful or not. They're the development of skills that predict success over the long haul.
And I know you don't want to hear this, but if Wilson's WRs are bad and they're not open when his right foot hits on a 3/5/7 drop, he has MORE opportunity to develop the skills of shifting forward into and manipulating the pocket as he goes through his reads.
If his O-line is leaky (another topic, I don't think it stands out as leaky; the sacks come from Wilson standing at the top of the pocket, relying on an internal clock instead of pressure still, and working his circus magic outside the pocket which too results in sacks sometimes) he also has more game-situation opportunities to feel pressure and to manipulate the pocket.
It is what it is.
RichNhansom":r27rhq7w said:
Case and point. Keap last year when his O-line suffered. His performance decreased significantly and that was with a good running game and a significantly better receiving corp that Russell had.
You're still talking about performance. FWIW I'm different than most 9ers fans, in that for Kaep's 16 games when 9ers fans were going gaga I had significant concerns about developmental things he wasn't doing. Since last year when most 9ers fans have run at Kaepernick with pitchforks I've actually been impressed with his development in some areas that have always concerned me. His stats went down because they were leaning on him more, because the O-Line was in shambles and because he's DEVELOPING skills that if he attains will make him better in the long term. In my opinion, Kaep last year is a good example of a QB improving his skills while his stats also went down, and a good example of how most pundits and posters can't really tell the difference between QB ability and statistics.
RichNhansom":r27rhq7w said:
He likes to use Drew Brees as an example because of similar size but Brees has way better receivers, O-line play and plays much easier defenses and yet still how did he do against us the last couple times he played us?
Again, I'm not talking stats. I'm talking about what Drew Brees DOES.
Also, FWIW, I think Brees makes his O-line and WRs look better than they are, not vice-versa.
It's pretty simple: Barring injury, name a WR who looked better or even nearly as good after playing with Brees, Brady, Rodgers or Manning than he did playing with one of those four guys. Name an O-Lineman who looked better or even nearly as good in pass-pro after playing with Brees, Brady, Rodgers or Manning than he did playing with one of those four guys.They don't exist.
Edit: I should also say that this last point isn't a knock on Wilson. As is documented in my posting here, I thought Golden Tate looked as good on the Seahawks as he does on the Lions. I was comparing him favorably to Hines Ward when he was on the Hawks. He was a guy who clearly was going to benefit from more volume, and always had the ability to handle a bigger role (another good example of people all too frequently confusing stats with ability; Tate hasn't improved on the Lions -- he's the exact same guy -- his stats are just better).