A
Anonymous
Guest
Hey, Anthony!...
Two words for you: "Spell Check".
Crymany!
:thcoffee:
Two words for you: "Spell Check".
Crymany!
:thcoffee:
I thought we already tried that this year? Maybe we ought to try the NFL draft this time? Or maybe an FA like usual given Sidney Rice pretty much worked out fine. Really all we need is either a big receiver or TE that can get those jump balls because Norwood and Richardson are a really good start but probably a year or two away like any rookie receiver.Uncle Si":3s11ikvm said:it sucks we arent good enough to "surround" our QB with talent straight from the CFL...
[iRo]It's spelled "criminy"[/iRo]HoustonHawk82":2zivzgzh said:Hey, Anthony!...
Two words for you: "Spell Check".
Crymany!
:thcoffee:
MizzouHawkGal":4xh3gv9l said:I thought we already tried that this year? Maybe we ought to try the NFL draft this time? Or maybe an FA like usual given Sidney Rice pretty much worked out fine. Really all we need is either a big receiver or TE that can get those jump balls because Norwood and Richardson are a really good start but probably a year or two away like any rookie receiver.Uncle Si":4xh3gv9l said:it sucks we arent good enough to "surround" our QB with talent straight from the CFL...
Healthy and actually still able to play Jurevicius? Hell yes! Though I believe given a year or two Norwood could be that type of receiver. So we do have to have a bit of patience at the same time. That Harvin trade hurt us on so many levels and I think we would be best served to try and get a good veteran receiver in the mix beyond Baldwin.Uncle Si":1h498dnf said:MizzouHawkGal":1h498dnf said:I thought we already tried that this year? Maybe we ought to try the NFL draft this time? Or maybe an FA like usual given Sidney Rice pretty much worked out fine. Really all we need is either a big receiver or TE that can get those jump balls because Norwood and Richardson are a really good start but probably a year or two away like any rookie receiver.Uncle Si":1h498dnf said:it sucks we arent good enough to "surround" our QB with talent straight from the CFL...
so you want Joe Jurevicius...
(I had to google the spelling)
MizzouHawkGal":1kssvp25 said:Healthy and actually still able to play Jurevicius? Hell yes! Though I believe given a year or two Norwood could be that type of receiver. So we do have to have a bit of patience at the same time. That Harvin trade hurt us on so many levels and I think we would be best served to try and get a good veteran receiver in the mix beyond Baldwin.Uncle Si":1kssvp25 said:MizzouHawkGal":1kssvp25 said:I thought we already tried that this year? Maybe we ought to try the NFL draft this time? Or maybe an FA like usual given Sidney Rice pretty much worked out fine. Really all we need is either a big receiver or TE that can get those jump balls because Norwood and Richardson are a really good start but probably a year or two away like any rookie receiver.Uncle Si":1kssvp25 said:it sucks we arent good enough to "surround" our QB with talent straight from the CFL...
so you want Joe Jurevicius...
(I had to google the spelling)
Anthony!":11opv50e said:Hasselbeck":11opv50e said:Anthony!":11opv50e said:We are not getting him, we do not throw enough, and Indy does and will offer more, they are serious about putting taletn around their franchise QB, So far our team not so much.
Completely wrong.
Hate to tell you it strue, INdy has oput a boat load of talent around lukc at the Wr postion. We have not, sorry but it is a fact.
Totally, he's all that. He just isn't a very good WR and expecting more from him is unfair. He's our new Obomanu.HoustonHawk82":15bngs54 said:I really like Kearse, though.
Seems like he dives in every pile, fearlessly. Not afraid to give a CB the business.
A scrapper, he is.
CALIHAWK1":2nukwudl said:This offense is a WR killer. I couldn't see any WR coming here if they had other options.
You're probably right, but I just don't think it has to be, ya know? What we've seen this season is that while our bread and butter is the running game, our passing game is not nearly good enough to win us games when we need it to. That's a problem.CALIHAWK1":2c3ol5u3 said:This offense is a WR killer. I couldn't see any WR coming here if they had other options.
pehawk":o2fbkjug said:CALIHAWK1":o2fbkjug said:This offense is a WR killer. I couldn't see any WR coming here if they had other options.
Nope, it'd have to be a chasing a ring guy. The only one of those I see as potentially coming free is Fitzgerald. He likes Seattle (on gameday), is a good blocker and would offer a stark contrast to their other big WR signing, Percy.
Fitz would be a realistic pursuit.
pehawk":1whkeb2q said:CALIHAWK1":1whkeb2q said:This offense is a WR killer. I couldn't see any WR coming here if they had other options.
Nope, it'd have to be a chasing a ring guy. The only one of those I see as potentially coming free is Fitzgerald. He likes Seattle (on gameday), is a good blocker and would offer a stark contrast to their other big WR signing, Percy.
Fitz would be a realistic pursuit.
Hawkfan77":s438b34y said:Not true, but I guess facts don't matter...Anthony!":s438b34y said:HuskerHawk":s438b34y said:Touche. I read it originally however as the Colts weren't doing anything to help Luck, not so much Seattle.
Ahh no INdy has given Luck a ton of weapons. His #3 Wr is better than our #1