The Ravens run a vastly different offensive scheme. About 3/4th's of Russell's passing attempts are in the pocket. In contrast, about half of Lamar's pass attempts are outside the pocket on designed RPO's. This, accompanied by the threat him running the ball, completely changes how you defend Lamar vs how you'd defend young Russell. For instance, if you blitz young Russ and he escapes, then it's a 20 yard gain. If you blitz Lamar and he escapes, then it's likely a 40+ yard gain or worse.Scorpion05":dihn2nqp said:The success of the Raven’s O-line effectively shuts down the myth that Russell’s O-line is poor because Russell’s unpredictable runs cause issues, he scrambles around too much, and doesn’t stay in the pocket.
Also willing to bet money that Kingsbury builds a killer O-line around Kyler Murray. And then no one will own the alternate facts that have dominated the debate around Russ’ struggles in recent years
Now, I think the Ravens have a better line anyway, but they certainly benefit from having a QB who runs a sub 4.3 forty and is adept at avoiding contact. If Wilson was as fast as Lamar, he'd be the greatest QB in NFL history. Unfortunately, Wilson is lucky if he can run a 4.8 forty, and he's not quite as nimble as he was 5 years ago.