Hawkfan77
Active member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
- Messages
- 3,280
- Reaction score
- 0
What he said is true.
Did you not watch our game vs the cowboys?
Did you not watch our game vs the cowboys?
Kam was hurt. Bobby missed basically the second half of the game. Maxwell barely played. No Lane. No Simon.Geologic":3iv4o7me said:Wasn't a couple of Seahawks on defense injured that game against the Cowboys? I remember Wagner being out and Kam not being at a 100%
A-Dog":118ljd3v said:by FAR?Seanhawk":118ljd3v said:They probably were better than the Hawks D when they played them.
MontanaHawk05":2k5pvjh4 said:kearly":2k5pvjh4 said:Detroit was awesome on D today, might have had a win if not for the mixed officials (such a brilliant idea in 2005, why not bring it back?).
I disagree. Their tackling was terrible (in ways that the LOB's isn't) on too many key plays.
drdiags":xv05wy24 said:They did have the ball for close to 40 minutes and completed a 3rd and 21 deep in their side of the field.
I am surprised no one has brought up what DeSean Jackson said yesterday on NFLN about the Seahawks WRs but the fans must have been out partying by then.
Seanhawk":cwuhf45b said:drdiags":cwuhf45b said:They did have the ball for close to 40 minutes and completed a 3rd and 21 deep in their side of the field.
I am surprised no one has brought up what DeSean Jackson said yesterday on NFLN about the Seahawks WRs but the fans must have been out partying by then.
What did he say?
Interesting. Thanks for this Doc.drdiags":j2y5htq0 said:Seanhawk":j2y5htq0 said:drdiags":j2y5htq0 said:They did have the ball for close to 40 minutes and completed a 3rd and 21 deep in their side of the field.
I am surprised no one has brought up what DeSean Jackson said yesterday on NFLN about the Seahawks WRs but the fans must have been out partying by then.
What did he say?
He basically said the Panthers would be better off playing the Seahawks because if the Panthers could stop Lynch, the Seahawks WRs Kearse and Baldwin were just too pedestrian (mediocre) to make a difference. I am sure someone must have tweeted his comments to Baldwin yesterday evening when Jackson made the statements. Jackson was pretty hard on Lindley as well, said he wouldn't let him start on his Pop Warner team.
I figure he was just speaking what he thought and had observed from playing them earlier and what he probably heard from the coaches and players during their preparation. He also crowed about getting his against the LOB so he pointed out that Cam and Benjamin could get theirs again, like Benjamin had in the prior meeting.
Just his observation but I would imagine Baldwin didn't appreciate him "keeping it real".
Rob12":24dq9vfo said:Yeah, if this is the definition of disrespect we have some thin-skinned 12's around here. I love that he said it because I know our guys will know he said it, and they look forward to the possibility of educating him. Other than that, it's harmless. Like others have said, our defense wasn't bringing it in Week 6.
If he gets his team past the Pack, he'll face the most ridiculous D he has ever seen.
drdiags":fpumz9nz said:He basically said the Panthers would be better off playing the Seahawks because if the Panthers could stop Lynch, the Seahawks WRs Kearse and Baldwin were just too pedestrian (mediocre) to make a difference.
hawkfannj":1ty8t8pp said:This those BS calls won't happen in Green BaySeafan":1ty8t8pp said:He'll never get to see the Hawks again. Packers will beat the 'boys.
Northhawk":slphdcj8 said:Rob12":slphdcj8 said:Yeah, if this is the definition of disrespect we have some thin-skinned 12's around here. I love that he said it because I know our guys will know he said it, and they look forward to the possibility of educating him. Other than that, it's harmless. Like others have said, our defense wasn't bringing it in Week 6.
If he gets his team past the Pack, he'll face the most ridiculous D he has ever seen.
Agreed. Now Jackson's comments are something that should be on the board next time the Hawks play the Beagles.