hawk45
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2009
- Messages
- 10,009
- Reaction score
- 16
MontanaHawk05":1li9ttrh said:Sgt. Largent":1li9ttrh said:But there are players Pete and John drafted and aquired on the D-line and defensive backfield that they wanted to look at in starting roles, so that made guys like Sherman, Earl and Bennett expendable.
If Pete and John really thought that any of the flotsam they had at the time were anywhere near solid starter status, much less approaching the talent of the guys they were replacing, then I really might have to consider jumping on the "PCJS can't evaluate talent after all" bandwagon, as much as it smells like dirty socks.
I agree that we are about to get front row seat to what happens when you lose a huge chunk of defensive talent and that any idea that the present backups are the next Sherman, Earl, or Bennett is wishcasting.
I suspect Pete knew we would face a large drop off losing this talent and figured this year was the right time to take the hit. And I agree with that, especially after seeing Kam and Avril go down, extending an injured Sherman and long in the tooth Bennett is only something you do if you think this year is a good time for all in.
But yeah, our D is going to struggle. I'll the thrilled if we can just stop the run a bit and find some answers in the secondary; I have little hope that we will shut down any top passing games with our rough backfield and Clark and the pips "pass rush".