You are so incorrect Cartire.
Harvin had a track record of behavior, injuries, "injuries", and other issues. Not only did he repeat and build on that track record - but his cost destroyed our ability to reload because of the draft cost. Oh, and he cost us Golden Tate - which you could argue almost assuredly would have won us another SB. With Tate, we don't lose that SB against New England as a for instance. Harvin kept this team from being a dynasty.
Then we have Graham, a guy that was already well known to us as a player that got 'alligator arms' when facing our defense. A guy that we had stories of our defense intimidating before the game. Trading for him destroyed our offense line, killed our run game, led to Lynch eventually leaving and for the most part....he never produced enough to make up for what he cost. He was a soft player that ended up injured anyway, but even when healthy never made up for the damage that trade did to our line or the other draft pick we lost.
BOTH were terrible moves and they were clearly terrible moves before the deal happened.
Clowney probably is not as good as Clark as a pass rusher (though we will see if the 4-3 is better for him) but he plays the run well. Maybe that trade works out, at least he is playing for a new contract so he probably won't be unmotivated (an issue with him). This should work out for us.
But the Harvin and Graham deals were stupid when they were made, Stupid after they were made. And glaringly bad moves even before they took the field for us.
ukeface:
