scutterhawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2010
- Messages
- 9,826
- Reaction score
- 1,797
STRONG!!!!, It's not just THAT PLAY, there is no CONSISTENCY on calls/non calls from the Officiating across the entire board.HawkStrong":2ht3sbgw said:hawksfansinceday1":2ht3sbgw said:Yeah this one really pissed me off. This call is a perfect example of a situation where if a sky judge were in play, he should overrule the call. After the sky judge buzzed down, the referee would announce, "the sky judge has ruled that the QB (or ball carrier) ducked into the hit from the defensive player who was in proper strike zone tackling position therefore there is no foul on the play".Hockey Guy":2ht3sbgw said:The call that bothered me the most, for some reason, was the penalty for helmet to helmet on Garoppolo after Clowney blew up the play. Even Booger was like WTF was he supposed to do when JimmyG starts going down, then doesn't, putting his head right in the contact zone at the very last possible second.
Pretty much every subjective penalty should be like this. Games might be a little longer, but it would get rid of so much BS.
It clouds the issue on ALL the crap calls, FOR INSTANCE, the ref's call on Golden Tate's TD against GB a few years back, that set the tone for my argument on DK's behalf in this game....I think Djmb's explanation of the play that I'm hung up on, makes a lot more sense than, Just accept what I'm telling you does...I don't handle smart ass responses well.