Silver Hawk
Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2015
- Messages
- 287
- Reaction score
- 3
Why would that be? I fully expected them to sign another guy. Can't have Sweezy running the ball if Brown goes down. Need competition for them both too. That being said, as soon as Beast is back, one of them (the competition loser) will be on the waiver wire again.[/quote]
If Marshawn's return was imminent, they would have stuck with what they had and not re-signed CM.[/quote]
Yes, if "imminent" was this week. I really can't imagine that they would not have signed an extra back for this week. CM and BB are basically on week to week contracts. Beast could be coming back in time for the Rams game and it still makes sense for the Seahawks to have signed both of these guys.[/quote]
Well, we're both on the record -- let's see what happens.[/quote]
I'm not suggesting ML is coming back anytime soon. Simply saying that I think the Seahawks would have / should have signed 2 backs this week no matter whether ML is coming back in 2 weeks or 10 weeks. There won't be any answer to that question unless we get JS to weigh in.
If Marshawn's return was imminent, they would have stuck with what they had and not re-signed CM.[/quote]
Yes, if "imminent" was this week. I really can't imagine that they would not have signed an extra back for this week. CM and BB are basically on week to week contracts. Beast could be coming back in time for the Rams game and it still makes sense for the Seahawks to have signed both of these guys.[/quote]
Well, we're both on the record -- let's see what happens.[/quote]
I'm not suggesting ML is coming back anytime soon. Simply saying that I think the Seahawks would have / should have signed 2 backs this week no matter whether ML is coming back in 2 weeks or 10 weeks. There won't be any answer to that question unless we get JS to weigh in.