Hmmm . . . I would say Bennett, but truth is that when he's on our side, he's hilarious, outspoken and one of the best interviews in the business. I'm annoyted by his present behavior, but not by HIM generally.
That being said, Bruce Irvin's schtick is chronically tiresome. He has no real mental, emotional or behavioral filter, and what makes him different than Bennett is that he isn't funny, he isn't deep, he isn't articulate. He spouts off but has nothing of real value to say, and often his "jokes" fall flat because they are both unfunny and offensive.
I think Pete has had to apologize and explain Bruce more than the other 500 players he's coached in Seattle combined.