hawknation2018
New member
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2018
- Messages
- 3,082
- Reaction score
- 0
1) Tyler Lockett, WR
2) Chris Carson, RB
3) Jaron Brown, WR
https://www.chatsports.com/seattle-seah ... 2018-38899
1) Tyler Lockett, WR
2) Chris Carson, RB
3) Jaron Brown, WR
https://www.chatsports.com/seattle-seah ... 2018-38899
hawknation2018":1tyo6uoq said:1) Tyler Lockett, WR
2) Chris Carson, RB
3) Jaron Brown, WR
https://www.chatsports.com/seattle-seah ... 2018-38899
chris98251":15m1s1t9 said:hawknation2018":15m1s1t9 said:1) Tyler Lockett, WR
2) Chris Carson, RB
3) Jaron Brown, WR
https://www.chatsports.com/seattle-seah ... 2018-38899
Does Prosise count as a sleeper also, I mean nobody has seen much of him yet.
hawknation2018":30afktao said:chris98251":30afktao said:hawknation2018":30afktao said:1) Tyler Lockett, WR
2) Chris Carson, RB
3) Jaron Brown, WR
https://www.chatsports.com/seattle-seah ... 2018-38899
Does Prosise count as a sleeper also, I mean nobody has seen much of him yet.
Definitely, if you're someone who thinks his added weight will help keep him healthy enough to contribute this year. His explosiveness, cutting ability, field vision are upper echelon. But most people aren't expecting anything from him due to his past injuries.
Jville":20zvwccu said:There no way Tyler Lockett can be considered a "Sleeper"
hawknation2018":wxoh2hem said:Jville":wxoh2hem said:There no way Tyler Lockett can be considered a "Sleeper"
I don't know about that. Lockett has faced criticism over his raw numbers: 664 yards as a rookie, 597 in his 2nd year, 555 last year. Some people have said they prefer Paul Richardson to him.
I think this could be a "breakout" year for Lockett if he is better utilized by our new OC.
Jville":26w0jqbo said:hawknation2018":26w0jqbo said:Jville":26w0jqbo said:There no way Tyler Lockett can be considered a "Sleeper"
I don't know about that. Lockett has faced criticism over his raw numbers: 664 yards as a rookie, 597 in his 2nd year, 555 last year. Some people have said they prefer Paul Richardson to him.
I think this could be a "breakout" year for Lockett if he is better utilized by our new OC.
The difference in opinion must lie in the difference in definition. Tyler Lockett is the real deal.
hawknation2018":2umwcrum said:Jville":2umwcrum said:hawknation2018":2umwcrum said:Jville":2umwcrum said:There no way Tyler Lockett can be considered a "Sleeper"
I don't know about that. Lockett has faced criticism over his raw numbers: 664 yards as a rookie, 597 in his 2nd year, 555 last year. Some people have said they prefer Paul Richardson to him.
I think this could be a "breakout" year for Lockett if he is better utilized by our new OC.
The difference in opinion must lie in the difference in definition. Tyler Lockett is the real deal.
Can Lockett become an 800+ yard receiver (and one day a 1k WR)? I think so.
Jville":1439a8wa said:There no way Tyler Lockett can be considered a "Sleeper"
Rat":qshikhtx said:Lockett was awful last year. I would have rather shipped him off for a 6th rounder and then kept Paul Richardson.
chris98251":247tu3vc said:hawknation2018":247tu3vc said:chris98251":247tu3vc said:
Does Prosise count as a sleeper also, I mean nobody has seen much of him yet.
Definitely, if you're someone who thinks his added weight will help keep him healthy enough to contribute this year. His explosiveness, cutting ability, field vision are upper echelon. But most people aren't expecting anything from him due to his past injuries.
Definition of a sleeper then, when someone doesn't expect anything and they bursts on the scene.
ImTheScientist":2r8qhxtk said:Hack writers....they should have just said Russell Wilson.
My list would be:
-Poona Ford
-Dion Jordan
-Will Dissly