byau
Active member
I like to look at the gamebooks after a game, just because I'm a geek (the Super Bowl 48 Gamebook was a large source for my "Super Bowl For 12s" blog post in my .sig)
Anyway, while watching the game you get a certain feel for it and to be honest it seemed like overall Peyton Manning was effective and was "having his way" for the majority of the game. The numbers themselves don't point that way and sometimes it's surprising to see the numbers
You can download the gamebook for this game here:
http://www.nfl.com/liveupdate/gamecente ... mebook.pdf
Some stats:
Peyton Manning passing OVERALL: 31 of 49
Peyton Manning passing LAST SCORING DRIVE: 3 of 9 for 85 yards (that's only a 33% completion rate!) (seemed like he was completing everything on that last drive, was surprised it was only 3 for 9!?)
Peyton's passer rating: 85.7 (wow? That's low!)
Broncos rushing: 20 attempts for 36 yards, 1.8 average (wow.. for some reason I though it would be higher)
Russell Wilson passing OVERALL: 24 of 34
Russ passing LAST SCORING DRIVE: 4 of 6.
Russ also rushed 21 yards, including getting a first down on a 3rd and 3 and a 3rd and 4 (clutch!)
Russ passer rating: 99.9 (pretty good considering he had the pick. thought it would be a bit lower)
Seahawks rushing: 37 attempts for 129 yards (3.5 average) (also for some reason I thought it was more)
And yet it was really close. While the numbers were less impressive than I had felt, it seemed like both teams were operating really well and the game was just a few plays from going either way
Hawks fans can point to one or two costly mistakes (interception, safety) that made it this close, otherwise the Hawks were dominating.
Broncos fans can point to one or two costly "mistakes" (interception, coin toss loss in OT) that shows the Broncos should have won this
Overall: this just shows you when you play one of the best teams in the league, one mistake can cost you the game regardless of whatever the numbers are. That's what champions do.
Yes I do put the Broncos very high on the list. If you make a mistake against them, they can capitalize. And as some thought the changes they made over the offseason brought out a much better team than we had seen, not to mention what seems to be a mentally tougher Payton Manning.
For the Hawks, I think I have finally figured out what it is. I was putting them as mentally softer than last year (losing a bit of hunger). Now I think I'm mistaken, I think they have the same hunger as last year. However, THIS YEAR other teams playing the Hawks will be more focused on them and will be hungrier when they play Seattle. So just to stay on par, the Seahawks need to be hungrier too. That's what I think is happening
Not only that, I think we all have much higher expectations for this team as many others have pointed out. It's almost as if the Seahawks make it a close game, we think something is not going right
Thoughts?
Anyway, while watching the game you get a certain feel for it and to be honest it seemed like overall Peyton Manning was effective and was "having his way" for the majority of the game. The numbers themselves don't point that way and sometimes it's surprising to see the numbers
You can download the gamebook for this game here:
http://www.nfl.com/liveupdate/gamecente ... mebook.pdf
Some stats:
Peyton Manning passing OVERALL: 31 of 49
Peyton Manning passing LAST SCORING DRIVE: 3 of 9 for 85 yards (that's only a 33% completion rate!) (seemed like he was completing everything on that last drive, was surprised it was only 3 for 9!?)
Peyton's passer rating: 85.7 (wow? That's low!)
Broncos rushing: 20 attempts for 36 yards, 1.8 average (wow.. for some reason I though it would be higher)
Russell Wilson passing OVERALL: 24 of 34
Russ passing LAST SCORING DRIVE: 4 of 6.
Russ also rushed 21 yards, including getting a first down on a 3rd and 3 and a 3rd and 4 (clutch!)
Russ passer rating: 99.9 (pretty good considering he had the pick. thought it would be a bit lower)
Seahawks rushing: 37 attempts for 129 yards (3.5 average) (also for some reason I thought it was more)
And yet it was really close. While the numbers were less impressive than I had felt, it seemed like both teams were operating really well and the game was just a few plays from going either way
Hawks fans can point to one or two costly mistakes (interception, safety) that made it this close, otherwise the Hawks were dominating.
Broncos fans can point to one or two costly "mistakes" (interception, coin toss loss in OT) that shows the Broncos should have won this
Overall: this just shows you when you play one of the best teams in the league, one mistake can cost you the game regardless of whatever the numbers are. That's what champions do.
Yes I do put the Broncos very high on the list. If you make a mistake against them, they can capitalize. And as some thought the changes they made over the offseason brought out a much better team than we had seen, not to mention what seems to be a mentally tougher Payton Manning.
For the Hawks, I think I have finally figured out what it is. I was putting them as mentally softer than last year (losing a bit of hunger). Now I think I'm mistaken, I think they have the same hunger as last year. However, THIS YEAR other teams playing the Hawks will be more focused on them and will be hungrier when they play Seattle. So just to stay on par, the Seahawks need to be hungrier too. That's what I think is happening
Not only that, I think we all have much higher expectations for this team as many others have pointed out. It's almost as if the Seahawks make it a close game, we think something is not going right
Thoughts?