I guess somebody says it not good to rotate the O line. Seems that Pete disagrees. I can see that teams want to have continuity on the O line and that is exactly what the Hawks want.
The only thing is they also want to develope players. You can not develope players unless you play them and so all the offensive line injuries that have seemingly hampered the O, is NOT a bad thing.... especially when they are winning on top of it.
Maybe the offense is slower to develope but it's developing continuity as a whole....and not just because the rookies are getting playing time.... but it's about the vets like Peters finding their role both on the field and chemestry in the locker room.
I have to say that both Carroll and Schneider have done an excellent job of putting together both rookies and veteran leadership for the chemistry of this team.
So hear it is... this team is special they are VERY WELL coached ....and after this last game against the Dawgs they can make a serious case about whose the actual DAWG'S are! Can't wait till the O finds rhythm!
Thoughts?
LTH
The only thing is they also want to develope players. You can not develope players unless you play them and so all the offensive line injuries that have seemingly hampered the O, is NOT a bad thing.... especially when they are winning on top of it.
Maybe the offense is slower to develope but it's developing continuity as a whole....and not just because the rookies are getting playing time.... but it's about the vets like Peters finding their role both on the field and chemestry in the locker room.
I have to say that both Carroll and Schneider have done an excellent job of putting together both rookies and veteran leadership for the chemistry of this team.
So hear it is... this team is special they are VERY WELL coached ....and after this last game against the Dawgs they can make a serious case about whose the actual DAWG'S are! Can't wait till the O finds rhythm!
Thoughts?
LTH