chris98251
Well-known member
Mick063":1rp8c85y said:chris98251":1rp8c85y said:Mick063":1rp8c85y said:Wasn't impressed last year and have not seen anything to change my mind.
Seattle running backs have a reputation of not going down with first contact. He just doesn't fill that mold.
Yeah why Carson now and Lynch before him led the league in yards after contact.
Real pillow Puffs.
Yes...Homer, the topic of this thread, is a pillow puff. He doesn't fit the mold of Lynch or Carson. He isn't even that good at what he is supposed to be good at. Making people miss.
The only job for a running back is to defeat one guy. Either by running through him or making him miss. If two or more tacklers get to him at the line of scrimmage, it is that fault of his teammates. If one tackler gets him down at the line off scrimmage, he didn't get the job done. In other words, many designed runs are drawn up with the intent that, if everyone performs their assignment correctly, the back has to defeat a single defender for the play to be successful. It really is that simple.
It is a matter of keeping tally of how often that fore mentioned isolation battle is won to determine if a given running back is NFL Caliber. Homer loses that isolation battle more often than he wins it. Alternatively, J.D. McKissik is an example of a recent Seahawk back that could get it done exclusively on Homer's supposed forte, elusiveness and burst. Homer is no J.D McKissik. Completely different level of player.
It wasn't that hard to comprehend.
Well you said SEATTLE RUNNING BACKS HAVE A REPUTATION, up there in green, backs not Homer, not McKissic who was the starter for the Jags.
Maybe it's not comprehension it's your ability to explain yourself clearly.