I agree with your analysis of the situation, but I'm not sure Wilson's strategy will work. Pete has never seemed like the type of guy who cares about media speculation. I'm sure, privately, it upsets him, but Russell's critique is fairly benign and a relatively easy narrative to combat from Pete's perspective. Pete will probably drop a sarcastic jab at Russell in his next press conference and move on. That's why I think this is a bad move on Russell's part. Seattle still holds all of the cards. So, he can throw a temper tantrum, but unless they want to move him, they won't.TwistedHusky":2wro95g8 said:This will be an interesting season.
The new strategy is clearly to annoy Pete.
Everything from calling out the Oline, to diminishing Pete's accomplishments, to going after his nepotism - is going to be geared to bother Pete personally.
Wilson's camp is going to slow drip a constant stream of negatively slanted stories from the inside, for a full offseason and likely the next season. They are going to make it personal for Pete so he just wants rid of Wilson no matter the cost (or in this instance, dead money hit).
It will probably work.
Pete has a lot of pride and self-belief. He will not like seeing all his accomplishments in the NFL attributed to someone else and then having someone leak every little detail that paints him or the team in a bad light for another year.
As I stated before...this is a campaign. It is a coordinated effort to assure that Carroll is so driven to off-load Wilson that he will agree to near anything workable the Wilson camp proposes at the end.
So we will see a lot of this until either Pete backs down or Wilson leaves.
Wilson camp's representation of his legacy could also backfire on him. Seattle ranked 27th, 26th, 27th, and 20th in passing offense during the most successful stretch of the Hawk's semi-dynasty. It's hard to make the case that Russell was the only reason that team was successful, which is the rhetoric currently being used by his camp.
This sets up an interesting dilemma that Russell would have brought on himself. Let's assume a scenario where Seattle does move on from him. In that scenario, if Wilson struggles to make another Superbowl and Pete Caroll and the Seahawks don't miss a beat, Wilson will have essentially set up the framework for which you'd retrospectively analyze his importance to the Seahawk's semi-dynasty. This becomes even worse if Seattle were to win with a QB many believe to be lesser than him during his era.
That's what his camp is overlooking when they attack Carroll's legacy. Wilson is not Tom Brady, Peyton Manning, or Aaron Rodgers. He was not the best player on a championship team. The merits of his legacy are directly tied to that historic defense. Without which, statistically, he's Kirk Cousins in a better situation. Now, most of us obviously believe Russell is significantly better than Cousins. However, if he leaves this situation and Pete continues having success, then the microscope will shift back to him, and I'm not sure it will be kind.