Well we still have yet to play the Panthers but I like our record. The offense is highly skilled and the defense is starting to “get it” so I like our balance heading into November. Your D was exposed yesterday in embarrassing fashion. Can Kyle hang with the big dogs Like Andy Reid, Pete Carroll and Beliceck? Not looking promising. The problem with having CMC is you’ll turn away from what worked before just to fit him into the scheme which means less touches for Deebo and Kittle
ok...
1) I wasn't making any comment about Seattle other than that they have a winning record and that the Niners beat them 27-7. I'm sure you DO feel good about them as I would had they just beaten SD. Good for you.
2) The D was exposed pretty badly by KC, but not really sure if there is another team/coach capable of doing that to them. We'll see, but I don't expect to see that happen again.
3) You are WAAAAYYY off on CMC. The 49ers are primarily a RUNNING team. Running with CMC won't limit Deebo or Kittle. It will limit Jeff Wilson Jr. At worst, it will prevent Deebo from getting a ton of carries from the backfield and I don't really mind that. Injuries at RB were a big reason he started getting those carries to begin with...first with Mostert and later with Mitchell.
Alot was made of the fact that the 49ers haven't had a 1000 yard rusher since Frank Gore. That's true, but that not because they aren't a running team and have a powerful run game. Its that their RBs share the load.
They get Elijah Mitchell back after the bye, You could do ALOT worse than a CMC, Juice, Mitchell backfield.
I understand the desire to hate on the CMC move. I get it as an opposing fan. I also get that there are some very real questions about giving that much up for a RB, and I don't disagree entirely.
This is kinda how I look at it tho...
The Shanahans have been EXCELLENT at taking good RBs and making them look REALLY good in their scheme. That's makes some people think, "why ever expend resources there if you get 1000 yard seasons out of low draft picks and FAs"?
My answer is this: Yes, they can make the likes of Olandis Gary, Mike Anderson, Alfred Morris, Raheem Mostert and others look good....but they can also make REALLY good runners look like Hall of Famers (see Terrell Davis).
Seems kinda ludicrous to me to think that a HOF back and a so-so back would be considered exactly the same in that scheme.
I mean Marshawn is another good example of that. Similar ZBS scheme and the dude was just unstoppable for several years there.
I have concerns RE cost and injury history, but I can't lie...dude is awesome if he can stay on the field.